Bruce v. Sangamon County Jail ( 2022 )


Menu:
  • UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS SPRINGFIELD DIVISION JAMARI BRUCE, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) 22-3061 ) SANGAMON COUNTY JAIL, et al. ) ) Defendants. ) MERIT REVIEW ORDER Plaintiff, proceeding pro se and presently incarcerated at Jacksonville Correctional Center, was granted leave to proceed in forma pauperis. The case is now before the Court for a merit review of Plaintiff’s claims. The Court must “screen” Plaintiff’s complaint, and through such process to identify and dismiss any legally insufficient claim, or the entire action if warranted. 28 U.S.C. § 1915A. A claim is legally insufficient if it “(1) is frivolous, malicious, or fails to state a claim upon which relief may be granted; or (2) seeks monetary relief from a defendant who is immune from such relief.” Id. The Court accepts the factual allegations as true, liberally construing them in the plaintiff's favor. Turley v. Rednour, 729 F.3d 645, 649 (7th Cir. 2013). Conclusory statements and labels are insufficient—the facts alleged must “state a claim for relief that is plausible on its face.” Alexander v. U.S., 721 F.3d 418, 422 (7th Cir. 2013) (citation omitted). Plaintiff alleges Sangamon County jail officials failed to provide adequate Covid-19 safeguards, medical care, and other basic necessities. Plaintiff allegations are conclusory without any information regarding the conditions of confinement he endured at the jail. Plaintiff has not provided enough information for the Court to find that he states a claim under the Fourteenth Amendment. Hardeman v. Curran, 933 F.3d 816, 823 (7th Cir. 2019). Plaintiff’s complaint is dismissed with leave to amend as instructed below. If Plaintiff files an amended complaint, he should provide more detail about the conditions and identify the jail officials responsible. IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED: 1) Plaintiff's complaint is dismissed for failure to state a claim pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(b)(6) and 28 U.S.C. § 1915A. Plaintiff shall have 30 days from the entry of this order to file an amended complaint. Failure to file an amended complaint will result in the dismissal of this case, without prejudice, for failure to state a claim. Plaintiff's amended complaint will replace Plaintiff's original complaint in its entirety. The amended complaint must contain all allegations against all Defendants. Piecemeal amendments are not accepted. 2) Plaintiff’s motion for counsel [4] is denied, with leave to renew upon demonstrating that he made attempts to hire his own counsel. Pruitt v. Mote, 503 F.3d 647, 654-55 (7th Cir. 2007). This typically requires writing to several lawyers and attaching the responses. If Plaintiff renews his motion, he should set forth how far he has gone in school, any jobs he has held inside and outside of prison, any classes he has taken in prison, and any prior litigation experience he has. Entered this 13th day of July, 2022. s/Sara Darrow SARA DARROW CHIEF U.S. DISTRICT JUDGE

Document Info

Docket Number: 3:22-cv-03061

Filed Date: 7/13/2022

Precedential Status: Precedential

Modified Date: 6/21/2024