People ex rel. Smith v. Chicago, Indiana & Southern Railroad , 256 Ill. 527 ( 1912 )

Per Curiam:

This is an appeal by the Chicago, Indiana and Southern Railroad Company from a judgment of the county court of Bureau county overruling appellant’s objections to the additional road and bridge taxes levied in the towns of Leepertown, Berlin and Selby and entering judgment and an order of sale for said taxes. In the town of Leepertown the commissioners of highways certified that a greater levy was needed than could be provided for by thirty-six cents on each $100 valuation, for the reasons “that flood and high water has washed out bridges and gravel pikes and roads in said town, making it necessary to construct new concrete bridges and repair and re-grável grades, pikes and roads in various places in said town.” In the town of Selby the reasons assigned in the certificate of the highway commissioners for the additional levy were, “repairing wash-outs on the DePue and Princeton road and repairing worn out gravel roads.” In the town of Berlin the reasons stated for the additional levy were, “for new bridges and repairing roads and bridges.” In each of these towns the highway commissioners obtained the consent of the board of town auditors and the assessor to such additional levies, which consent was given in writing and recited the reasons stated in the certificates of the respective boards of highway commissioners. The objection interposed to these several additional levies is, that the reasons stated in the certificates were not sufficient to justify the additional levy under section 14, as the same was amended in 1911. The precise question involved in this case has airead)'- had the consideration of the court in several cases at the present term, and the conclusions reached in all those cases are contrary to the contention of appellant in this case. For the reasons given in People v. DeKalb and Great Western Railroad Co. (ante, p. 290,) People v. Cairo, Vincennes and Chicago Railway Co. (ante, p. 286,) and People v. Wabash Railroad Co. (ante, p. 394,) the judgment of the county court of Bureau county is affirmed.

Judgment affirmed.