O'Reilly v. Samuels , 55 Ill. App. 438 ( 1894 )

Mr. Justice Waterman

delivered the opinion of the Court.

This was an action upon a promissory note.

The defendant endeavored to show by cross-examination of the plaintiff that the note was given for losses sustained in a gambling transaction on the Board of Trade.

Only a question of fact is involved. We see no sufficient reason for interfering with the judgment of the Superior Court and it is affirmed.