Randal v. Gehm , 1895 Ill. App. LEXIS 763 ( 1895 )

Mr. Presiding Justice Gary

delivered the opinion of the Court.

The controversy in this case is whether the appellee pit id the collector of the appellants for a car load of potatoes. Either the appellee or the collector perjured himself, and it is impossible that we should know which did. The court without a jury found for the appellee, whose version was in keeping with the fact that he had the collector’s receipt, and such finding is conclusive.

The judgment is affirmed.