Michael R. Pilkington v. Karen A. Pilkington ( 2017 )


Menu:
  • ATTORNEYS FOR APPELLANT                                      ATTORNEY FOR APPELLEE
    Thomas M. Beeman                                             Donald K. McClellan
    Alexander M. Beeman                                          McClellan & McClellan
    Beeman Law                                                   Muncie, Indiana
    Anderson, Indiana
    ______________________________________________________________________________
    FILED
    Aug 30 2017, 3:19 pm
    In the                                               CLERK
    Indiana Supreme Court
    Court of Appeals
    and Tax Court
    Indiana Supreme Court
    _________________________________
    No. 18S02-1708-PL-554
    MICHAEL R. PILKINGTON,
    Appellant (Plaintiff below),
    v.
    KAREN A. PILKINGTON,
    Appellee (Defendant below).
    _________________________________
    Appeal from the Delaware Circuit Court, No. 18C05-1510-PL-24
    The Honorable Thomas A. Cannon, Jr.
    _________________________________
    On Petition to Transfer from the Indiana Court of Appeals, No. 18A02-1605-PL-1086
    _________________________________
    August 30, 2017
    Per Curiam.
    Michael Pilkington filed a complaint against his stepmother, Karen Pilkington, alleging
    she violated her duties as the trustee of a trust created by Michael’s deceased father. The trust
    contained the father’s interest in multiple limited liability companies (“LLCs”). Karen contends
    Michael has no interest in the trust because he filed for Chapter 7 bankruptcy and, at the trustee’s
    request, sold Karen his interest in the LLCs. Michael contends he sold Karen only his present
    ownership interest in the LLCs, not his remainder interest in the trust.
    Karen filed a motion to dismiss the complaint for lack of subject matter jurisdiction,
    arguing the bankruptcy court has exclusive jurisdiction to determine what interest Michael sold.
    The trial court dismissed Michael’s complaint with prejudice. The Court of Appeals reversed and
    remanded, holding the trial court has subject matter jurisdiction to determine what interest Michael
    sold to Karen in the Chapter 7 bankruptcy proceeding. Pilkington v. Pilkington, 
    71 N.E.3d 865
    (Ind. Ct. App. 2017).
    We agree with Senior Judge Shepard’s analysis and the result reached by the Court of
    Appeals. Accordingly, we grant transfer, adopt and incorporate by reference the Court of Appeals
    opinion in accordance with Indiana Appellate Rule 58(A)(1), reverse the trial court, and remand.
    All Justices concur.
    2
    

Document Info

Docket Number: 18S02-1708-PL-554

Judges: Per Curiam

Filed Date: 8/30/2017

Precedential Status: Precedential

Modified Date: 11/11/2024