State Ex Rel. Tonan v. Bottorff, Judge , 219 Ind. 26 ( 1941 )


Menu:
  • The relator alleges that he is serving a sentence of life imprisonment upon a conviction of kidnapping; that he filed a petition for a writ of error coram nobis in the Clark Circuit Court, in which he was convicted, but that the judge of said court has refused to act upon his petition. In a verified return it appears that, while a petition was filed, there has never been a request that it be assigned for trial.

    It is a common practice in many of our courts of general jurisdiction that causes are not assigned for trial until a request for an assignment is made, and, under such circumstances, it cannot be said that the court has refused a trial. This court will not mandate the trial court to perform some duty which it has not been requested to perform.

    Petition for writ of mandate denied.

    NOTE. — Reported in 36 N.E.2d 766. *Page 28

Document Info

Docket Number: No. 27,615.

Citation Numbers: 36 N.E.2d 766, 219 Ind. 26, 1941 Ind. LEXIS 202

Judges: PER CURIAM.

Filed Date: 10/7/1941

Precedential Status: Precedential

Modified Date: 10/19/2024