-
Appellant was convicted for violating § 4, ch. 48, Acts 1925, § 2717 Burns 1926. Errors assigned here present the question of the admissibility in evidence of intoxicating liquor seized 1, 2. and information gained by police officers while making a search of appellant's premises under a search warrant (provided for by § 31, ch. 48, Acts 1925, § 2746 Burns 1926). The search warrant was issued without a sufficient showing that reasonable and probable cause existed for the search — there being neither a positive allegation of facts in the affidavit for the search warrant, nor a hearing of evidence by the issuing magistrate. Becker v. State (1928),
200 Ind. 397 ,164 N.E. 27 ; Gwinn v. State (1929),201 Ind. 420 , 423,166 N.E. 769 ;Seeger v. State (1929),201 Ind. 469 , 474,168 N.E. 577 . *Page 685Judgment reversed, with instructions to sustain appellant's motion for a new trial.
Myers, J., absent.
Document Info
Docket Number: No. 25,150.
Judges: Martin
Filed Date: 10/13/1931
Precedential Status: Precedential
Modified Date: 11/9/2024