-
The identical question involved in this case was decided by this court in State v. Billings (1929), ante 135,
168 N.E. 453 . On authority of that case, the judgment herein should be affirmed. Each side has filed a petition for oral argument; but, as the counsel for both the appellant and appellee filed briefs in the Billings case on the petition for rehearing, which petition has been denied, it appears that an oral argument is not necessary. The petitions for oral argument are denied.Judgment affirmed.
*Page 1
Document Info
Docket Number: No. 25,806.
Citation Numbers: 172 N.E. 925, 202 Ind. 700, 1930 Ind. LEXIS 57
Judges: PER CURIAM.
Filed Date: 7/3/1930
Precedential Status: Precedential
Modified Date: 11/9/2024