michael-e-lyons-ind-denita-l-lyons-ind-michael-e-lyons-and-denita-l ( 2013 )


Menu:
  • FOR PUBLICATION                                                             Jul 31 2013, 6:47 am
    ATTORNEY FOR APPELLANTS:                        ATTORNEYS FOR APPELLEES
    RICHMOND COMMUNITY SCHOOL
    GARY P. PRICE                                   CORPORATION ET AL.:
    Indianapolis, Indiana                           RICK D. MEILS
    JOHN W. MERVILDE
    Meils Thompson Dietz & Berish
    Indianapolis, Indiana
    ATTORNEY FOR APPELLEE
    INDIANA INSURANCE COMPANY:
    JAMES S. STEPHENSON
    Stephenson Morow & Semler
    Indianapolis, Indiana
    IN THE
    COURT OF APPEALS OF INDIANA
    MICHAEL E. LYONS, Individually;                 )
    DENITA L. LYONS, Individually;                  )
    MICHAEL E. LYONS and DENITA L.                  )
    LYONS, as Co-personal Representatives           )
    of the Estate of Megan Renee Lyons, Deceased,   )
    )
    Appellants/Plaintiffs,                   )
    )
    vs.                              )   No. 89A04-1204-PL-159
    )
    RICHMOND COMMUNITY SCHOOL                       )
    CORPORATION d/b/a RICHMOND                      )
    HIGH SCHOOL; JOE SPICER;                        )
    JEFFREY THORNE; and MAGGIE LaRUE,               )
    in their individual and official capacities,    )
    )
    Appellees/Defendants,                    )
    )
    INDIANA INSURANCE COMPANY,                         )
    )
    Appellee/Non-Party-Respondent.              )
    APPEAL FROM THE WAYNE SUPERIOR COURT
    The Honorable Peter D. Haviza, Special Judge
    Cause No. 89D01-1006-PL-11
    July 31, 2013
    OPINION ON REHEARING - FOR PUBLICATION
    BRADFORD, Judge
    Appellees/Defendants Richmond Community School Corporation and certain school
    administrators (“RCSC”) petition this court for rehearing. We grant RCSC’s petition, in part,
    for the limited purpose of concluding that, “[a]lthough there may be factual issues to be
    determined, whether there has been compliance with the [Indiana Tort Claims] Act’s notice
    requirement is a question of law for the court.” Gregor v. Szarmach, 
    706 N.E.2d 240
    , 241
    (Ind. Ct. App. 1999); accord City of Indpls. v. Satz, 
    377 N.E.2d 623
    , 625 (1978). In our
    original opinion, we stated that the issue should be presented to the jury.
    On remand, the trial court that should determine whether, in the exercise of ordinary
    diligence, Appellants/Plaintiffs Michael and Denita Lyons could have learned of RCSC’s
    alleged “tortious acts” prior to July 15, 2009. Wehling v. Citizens Nat’l Bank, 
    586 N.E.2d 840
    ,
    843 (Ind. 1992). July 15, 2009, was 180 days before the Lyonses filed notice of their claims
    on January 11, 2010. In all other respects, we reaffirm our original disposition.
    2
    ROBB, C.J., and BAKER, J., concur.
    3
    

Document Info

Docket Number: 89A04-1204-PL-159

Filed Date: 7/31/2013

Precedential Status: Precedential

Modified Date: 2/1/2016