Jeremiah Roberts v. State of Indiana (mem. dec.) ( 2017 )


Menu:
  • MEMORANDUM DECISION
    FILED
    Pursuant to Ind. Appellate Rule 65(D),                                    Oct 31 2017, 10:27 am
    this Memorandum Decision shall not be
    CLERK
    regarded as precedent or cited before any                                  Indiana Supreme Court
    Court of Appeals
    court except for the purpose of establishing                                    and Tax Court
    the defense of res judicata, collateral
    estoppel, or the law of the case.
    ATTORNEY FOR APPELLANT                                   ATTORNEYS FOR APPELLEE
    Ellen M. O’Connor                                        Curtis T. Hill, Jr.
    Marion County Public Defender Agency                     Attorney General of Indiana
    Indianapolis, Indiana                                    Christina D. Pace
    Deputy Attorney General
    Indianapolis, Indiana
    IN THE
    COURT OF APPEALS OF INDIANA
    Jeremiah Roberts,                                        October 31, 2017
    Appellant-Defendant,                                     Court of Appeals Case No.
    49A05-1702-CR-289
    v.                                               Appeal from the Marion Superior
    Court
    State of Indiana,                                        The Honorable Marc
    Appellee-Plaintiff.                                      T. Rothenberg, Judge
    Trial Court Cause No.
    49G02-1401-MR-2947
    Pyle, Judge.
    Court of Appeals of Indiana | Memorandum Decision 49A05-1702-CR-289 | October 31, 2017             Page 1 of 6
    Statement of the Case
    [1]   Jeremiah Roberts (“Roberts”) appeals his conviction by jury of murder.1 He
    argues that the evidence is insufficient to support his conviction because the
    State failed to prove his identity beyond a reasonable doubt. Concluding that
    the evidence is sufficient, we affirm his conviction.
    [2]   We affirm.
    Issue
    The sole issue for our review is whether there is sufficient
    evidence to support Roberts’ conviction.
    Facts
    [3]   The facts most favorable to the verdict reveal that in January 2014, the owner of
    a dog rescue shelter in Indianapolis allowed Roberts, Derek Romano
    (“Romano”), and their two dogs to stay in a pole barn on the shelter’s property.
    Because Roberts and Romano were homeless and jobless, the shelter’s owner,
    Jennifer Fodera (“Fodera”) allowed the men to take care of the shelter dogs and
    to do odd jobs in exchange for the room.
    [4]   On January 18, Roberts ordered a pizza for the sole purpose of robbing the
    delivery driver. When the driver, John Sullivan (“Sullivan”), arrived at the
    shelter, Roberts attacked him with a hammer in the front entry of the shelter,
    1
    IND. CODE § 35-42-1-1.
    Court of Appeals of Indiana | Memorandum Decision 49A05-1702-CR-289 | October 31, 2017   Page 2 of 6
    duct-taped his hands behind his back, and dragged his body to the basement.
    After attempting to clean up Sullivan’s blood in the entry and office areas,
    Roberts and Romano stole Sullivan’s car and drove west.
    [5]   When Fodera and a helper arrived at the shelter the following morning, they
    noticed blood in the office and on the basement door. Fodera also noticed a
    hammer that was usually kept in the pole barn and bleach that was usually kept
    under the sink. As Fodera walked down the stairs to the basement, she noticed
    blood and possible drag marks. She discovered Sullivan’s body behind a
    furnace in the basement. His hands were secured with duct tape, and his body
    was covered in plastic that was also secured with duct tape. He wore an empty
    gun holster.
    [6]   Roberts and Romano were subsequently arrested in Wyoming after they
    abandoned Sullivan’s car. Police officers found Sullivan’s gun in Roberts’
    backpack. During his initial interview with the Wyoming police officers,
    Roberts denied that he had ever been in Indiana. Roberts later told the officers
    that Sullivan had confronted him with a gun so Roberts had tied him up and
    had placed him in the basement.
    [7]   Roberts subsequently admitted robbing Sullivan but denied killing him.
    Specifically, Roberts explained as follows:
    We ordered a pizza. Fucking robbed him, tied him up, put him
    in the basement. We ain’t killed nobody . . . I don’t know he
    must have fell down the stairs or something. I don’t know what
    Court of Appeals of Indiana | Memorandum Decision 49A05-1702-CR-289 | October 31, 2017   Page 3 of 6
    happened to him, but we just took him and put him in the
    basement and we left and we drove down here.
    (Ex. 22 at 30).
    [8]    Roberts was charged in Indiana with robbery and murder. Testimony at
    Roberts’ jury trial revealed that Sullivan’s cause of death was multiple blunt
    force traumatic injuries to the head. These injuries were consistent with having
    been caused by a hammer. Sullivan, who was bound with duct tape, also
    suffered from scrapes and bruising to his chest that were consistent with his
    body having been dragged. Sullivan’s DNA, which was based on blood
    evidence, was found inside the front door, on the front entry landing, along a
    pathway from the front door to the basement, and on the basement door.
    [9]    Testimony at trial also revealed that Roberts’ DNA was found on the out-of-
    place hammer’s handle and on the sticky side of a roll of duct tape in the office.
    Roberts’ hand print was found on the bleach bottle.
    [10]   At trial, Roberts testified that Romano had initiated the robbery and had fought
    with Sullivan over Sullivan’s gun. Roberts testified that he had intervened to
    help Romano, and the two men then walked Sullivan to the basement and told
    him to stay there until they were gone. He further testified that they drove off
    in Sullivan’s car, but Romano had insisted that they return to the house for his
    phone. According to Roberts, he waited in the car while Romano went inside
    for five to ten minutes and that they then drove to Wyoming in Sullivan’s car.
    Court of Appeals of Indiana | Memorandum Decision 49A05-1702-CR-289 | October 31, 2017   Page 4 of 6
    [11]   The jury convicted Roberts of robbery and murder. He now appeals the murder
    conviction.
    Decision
    [12]   Roberts argues that there is insufficient evidence to support his murder
    conviction because the State failed to prove his identity as the perpetrator of the
    murder beyond a reasonable doubt. Our standard of review for sufficiency of
    the evidence claims is well settled. We consider only the probative evidence
    and reasonable inferences supporting the verdict. Drane v. State, 
    867 N.E.2d 144
    , 146 (Ind. 2007). We do not reweigh the evidence or judge witness
    credibility. 
    Id. We will
    affirm the conviction unless no reasonable fact finder
    could find the elements of the crime proven beyond a reasonable doubt. 
    Id. The evidence
    is sufficient if an inference may be reasonably drawn from it to
    support the verdict. 
    Id. at 147.
    [13]   Roberts specifically argues that his “mere presence [at the crime scene] and the
    circumstantial evidence were insufficient to convict him [of murder].”
    (Roberts’ Br. 11). However, we agree with the State that “ample circumstantial
    evidence supported the jury’s conclusion that [Roberts] was the individual who
    committed Sullivan’s murder.” (State’s Br. 12).
    [14]   Specifically, our review of the evidence reveals that Roberts admitted robbing
    Sullivan and walking him to the basement but denied killing him. However,
    Sullivan’s blood and DNA were found inside the front door, on the front entry
    landing, along a pathway from the front door to the basement, and on the
    Court of Appeals of Indiana | Memorandum Decision 49A05-1702-CR-289 | October 31, 2017   Page 5 of 6
    basement door. He was found dead in the basement. His hands were bound
    with duct tape, and he was covered in plastic wrap that was also secured with
    duct tape. Sullivan’s death was caused by blunt force traumatic injuries to his
    head that were consistent with being struck with a hammer. Sullivan also had
    injuries consistent with having been dragged down the stairs to the basement.
    Roberts’ DNA was found on a hammer and a bottle of bleach. His DNA was
    also found on the sticky side of a roll of duct tape. This evidence, which
    supports a reasonable inference that Roberts murdered Sullivan, is sufficient to
    support Roberts’ murder conviction. See 
    Drane, 867 N.E.2d at 147
    .
    [15]   Roberts’ arguments that he “used supplies and tools to tend to the rescue dogs”
    and that Sullivan “was standing and cussing when [Roberts] headed west” are
    nothing more than requests that we reweigh the evidence. (Roberts’ Br. at 10,
    14). This we cannot do. See 
    id. at 146.
    There is sufficient evidence to support
    Roberts’ conviction.
    [16]   Affirmed.
    Riley, J., and Robb, J., concur.
    Court of Appeals of Indiana | Memorandum Decision 49A05-1702-CR-289 | October 31, 2017   Page 6 of 6
    

Document Info

Docket Number: 49A05-1702-CR-289

Filed Date: 10/31/2017

Precedential Status: Precedential

Modified Date: 10/31/2017