Matthew A. Johnson v. State of Indiana (mem. dec.) ( 2018 )


Menu:
  • MEMORANDUM DECISION
    Pursuant to Ind. Appellate Rule 65(D),
    this Memorandum Decision shall not be
    regarded as precedent or cited before any
    FILED
    court except for the purpose of establishing                         Dec 19 2018, 9:09 am
    the defense of res judicata, collateral                                  CLERK
    Indiana Supreme Court
    estoppel, or the law of the case.                                       Court of Appeals
    and Tax Court
    ATTORNEY FOR APPELLANT                                  ATTORNEYS FOR APPELLEE
    Justin R. Wall                                          Curtis T. Hill, Jr.
    Wall Legal Services                                     Attorney General of Indiana
    Huntington, Indiana
    Tiffany McCoy
    Deputy Attorney General
    Indianapolis, Indiana
    IN THE
    COURT OF APPEALS OF INDIANA
    Matthew A. Johnson,                                     December 19, 2018
    Appellant-Defendant,                                    Court of Appeals Case No.
    18A-CR-2023
    v.                                              Appeal from the Wabash Circuit
    Court
    State of Indiana,                                       The Honorable Robert R.
    Appellee-Plaintiff.                                     McCallen III, Judge
    Trial Court Cause No.
    85C01-1802-F5-220
    Bradford, Judge.
    Court of Appeals of Indiana | Memorandum Decision 18A-CR-2023 | December 19, 2018            Page 1 of 4
    Case Summary
    [1]   After pleading guilty to Level 5 felony battery resulting in injury to a public
    safety officer, Matthew A. Johnson was sentenced to a four-year term of
    incarceration. Johnson contends on appeal that his sentence is inappropriate.
    Because we conclude otherwise, we affirm.
    Facts and Procedural History
    [2]   Beginning on January 18, 2018, Johnson was confined at the Wabash County
    Jail for pending charges of domestic battery, theft, and eleven counts of
    invasion of privacy. On February 17, 2018, while two corrections officers were
    speaking to another inmate just outside of the cell doors, Johnson crossed a
    yellow line that inmates know not to cross, grabbed a bar near the door for
    leverage, and kicked the door open with his right foot. The door struck Officer
    Denver Brown in the arm causing redness, partially torn skin, and bruising.
    Johnson was then observed laughing, giving another inmate a fist bump, and
    giving the middle finger to a surveillance camera.
    [3]   On February 26, 2018, the State charged Johnson with Level 5 felony battery
    resulting in injury to a public safety officer. Johnson subsequently pled guilty.
    The trial court accepted Johnson’s plea and sentenced him to a four-year term
    of incarceration.
    Discussion and Decision
    Court of Appeals of Indiana | Memorandum Decision 18A-CR-2023 | December 19, 2018   Page 2 of 4
    [4]   Johnson contends that his four-year sentence is inappropriate. Indiana
    Appellate Rule 7(B) provides that “The Court may revise a sentence authorized
    by statute if, after due consideration of the trial court’s decision, the Court finds
    that the sentence is inappropriate in light of the nature of the offense and the
    character of the offender.” In analyzing such claims, we “‘concentrate less on
    comparing the facts of [the case at issue] to others, whether real or hypothetical,
    and more on focusing on the nature, extent, and depravity of the offense for
    which the defendant is being sentenced, and what it reveals about the
    defendant’s character.’” Paul v. State, 
    888 N.E.2d 818
    , 825 (Ind. Ct. App. 2008)
    (quoting Brown v. State, 
    760 N.E.2d 243
    , 247 (Ind. Ct. App. 2002), trans. denied).
    The defendant bears the burden of persuading us that his sentence is
    inappropriate. Sanchez v. State, 
    891 N.E.2d 174
    , 176 (Ind. Ct. App. 2008).
    [5]   Following his conviction for a Level 5 felony, Johnson could have been
    sentenced to a maximum sentence of six years. See 
    Ind. Code § 35-50-2-6
    (b)
    (providing that a person who commits a Level 5 felony “shall be imprisoned for
    a fixed term of between one (1) and six (6) years, with the advisory sentence
    being three (3) years). Johnson claims that his slightly enhanced four-year
    sentence is inappropriate because his actions were “not exactly egregious due to
    the fact that Officer Brown only suffered a minor abrasion to his arm” and did
    not require any additional medical treatment. Appellant’s Br. p. 15. While
    Officer Brown may have been lucky enough to avoid serious injury, Johnson’s
    actions were nonetheless serious. While incarcerated and without any stated
    provocation, Johnson forcibly kicked a jail cell door, striking Officer Brown.
    Court of Appeals of Indiana | Memorandum Decision 18A-CR-2023 | December 19, 2018   Page 3 of 4
    [6]   As for Johnson’s character, the record reveals that Johnson had two prior
    misdemeanor convictions and a prior probation violation. In addition, at the
    time he committed the incident in question, Johnson had thirteen pending
    criminal charges. Further, while Johnson claims to be remorseful, his actions
    immediately after the incident suggest otherwise. The record reveals that
    immediately after kicking the cell door, Johnson was laughing and gave a fist
    bump to another inmate before turning to give the middle finger to the security
    camera. Johnson has failed to convince us that his four-year sentence is
    inappropriate.
    [7]   The judgment of the trial court is affirmed.
    Bailey, J., and Brown, J., concur.
    Court of Appeals of Indiana | Memorandum Decision 18A-CR-2023 | December 19, 2018   Page 4 of 4
    

Document Info

Docket Number: 18A-CR-2023

Filed Date: 12/19/2018

Precedential Status: Precedential

Modified Date: 12/19/2018