Joseph A. Demma v. State of Indiana (mem. dec.) ( 2018 )


Menu:
  •       MEMORANDUM DECISION
    Pursuant to Ind. Appellate Rule 65(D),                                       FILED
    this Memorandum Decision shall not be
    Dec 10 2018, 10:32 am
    regarded as precedent or cited before any
    court except for the purpose of establishing                                 CLERK
    Indiana Supreme Court
    the defense of res judicata, collateral                                     Court of Appeals
    and Tax Court
    estoppel, or the law of the case.
    ATTORNEY FOR APPELLANT                                  ATTORNEYS FOR APPELLEE
    Cara Schaefer Wieneke                                   Curtis T. Hill, Jr.
    Wieneke Law Office, LLC                                 Attorney General of Indiana
    Brooklyn, Indiana
    Monika Prekopa Talbot
    Supervising Deputy Attorney
    General
    Indianapolis, Indiana
    IN THE
    COURT OF APPEALS OF INDIANA
    Joseph A. Demma,                                        December 10, 2018
    Appellant-Defendant,                                    Court of Appeals Case No.
    18A-CR-1804
    v.                                              Appeal from the
    Vigo Superior Court
    State of Indiana,                                       The Honorable
    Appellee-Plaintiff.                                     John T. Roach, Judge
    Trial Court Cause No.
    84D01-1304-FC-1279
    Kirsch, Judge.
    [1]   Joseph A. Demma (“Demma”) appeals the trial court’s order revoking his
    direct placement in home detention. He raises the following issue for our
    Court of Appeals of Indiana | Memorandum Decision 18A-CR-1804 | December 10, 2018                Page 1 of 5
    review: whether his case should be remanded to the trial court because the trial
    court failed to give Demma credit time for time he served while incarcerated
    when his case was pending.
    [2]   We remand.
    Facts and Procedural History
    [3]   On October 18, 2013, Demma pleaded guilty to two counts of forgery, both as
    Class C felonies. Pursuant to the plea agreement, Demma’s sentence was
    capped at six years. Appellant’s App. Vol. 2 at 41. On January 27, 2014, the trial
    court sentenced Demma to six years for each count with the sentences to run
    concurrently. 
    Id. at 78.
    The trial court further ordered that four years of his
    sentence be served as a direct commitment to home detention and the
    remaining two years be suspended to probation. 
    Id. at 78-82.
    Demma filed a
    motion to modify his sentence, and on July 20, 2016, the trial court granted the
    motion and suspended the balance of Demma’s executed time to probation. 
    Id. at 87.
    The trial court noted that Demma’s term of probation at that time was
    two years, six months, and twenty-three days. 
    Id. at 88.
    [4]   On March 12, 2018, Demma was arrested after the State filed a petition alleging
    that he violated the terms of his probation. 
    Id. at 10.
    Demma remained
    incarcerated from March 12, 2018 through April 18, 2018. Each time he
    appeared in court, on March 12, March 13, April 10, and April 18, 2018,
    Demma appeared “in custody of the Vigo County Jail.” 
    Id. at 106-07,
    111, 113.
    On April 18, 2018, Demma admitted that he violated the terms of his
    Court of Appeals of Indiana | Memorandum Decision 18A-CR-1804 | December 10, 2018   Page 2 of 5
    probation, and the parties agreed that the balance of Demma’s probation,
    which was two years, six months, and twenty-two days, would be revoked and
    that Demma would serve that time as a direct commitment to home detention.
    
    Id. at 113.
    Neither the revocation order nor the abstract of judgment reflected
    that Demma was entitled to credit for the time he spent in jail. 
    Id. at 113-16.
    [5]   Thereafter, Demma violated the terms of his home detention by testing positive
    for methamphetamine and admitted the violation at a hearing held on July 3,
    2018. 
    Id. at 117-18;
    Tr. Vol. 2 at 7. At the hearing, the trial court inquired as to
    the amount of credit time to which Demma was entitled, and Demma stated
    that he had sixty-three days of incarceration between February 24, 2018 and
    April 27, 2018. Tr. Vol. 2 at 8. The trial court stated that it was only interested
    in credit accrued since April 18, 2018. 
    Id. The trial
    court ordered that Demma
    serve the balance of his probation period in the Indiana Department of
    Correction and awarded him eighty-four days of credit for sixteen days served
    on home detention from May 22, 2018 through June 6, 2018, and for twenty-six
    days served in jail from June 6, 2018 through July 2, 2018. 
    Id. at 8-9;
    Appellant’s
    App. Vol. 2 at 123. Demma informed the court that he believed he was entitled
    to credit time for the time he had spent in the jail in March, April, and May
    2018. Tr. Vol. 2 at 26. The trial court disagreed. 
    Id. Demma now
    appeals.
    Discussion and Decision
    [6]   Demma argues, and the State concedes, that he was entitled to credit time for
    time spent incarcerated between March 12, 2018 and April 18, 2018 and that he
    Court of Appeals of Indiana | Memorandum Decision 18A-CR-1804 | December 10, 2018   Page 3 of 5
    was not given this credit time when the trial court revoked his direct placement
    to home detention. We agree with the parties.
    [7]   Our Supreme Court has noted that “there are two types of credit that must be
    calculated: ‘(1) the credit toward the sentence a prisoner receives for time
    actually served; and (2) the additional credit a prisoner receives for good
    behavior and educational attainment.’” Maciaszek v. State, 
    75 N.E.3d 1089
    ,
    1092 (Ind. Ct. App. 2017) (quoting Purcell v. State, 
    721 N.E.2d 220
    , 222 (Ind.
    1999)), trans. denied. “Because credit time is a matter of statutory right, trial
    courts do not have discretion in awarding or denying such credit.” Harding v.
    State, 
    27 N.E.3d 330
    , 331-32 (Ind. Ct. App. 2015).
    [8]   Here, in our review of the record, it appears that Demma was incarcerated in
    the Vigo County Jail awaiting the disposition of a probation violation from
    March 12, 2018 through April 18, 2018. Although the exact dates are not clear
    from the record, an arrest warrant was served on Demma on March 12, 2018.
    Appellant’s App. Vol. 2 at 10. Thereafter, it appears that he remained in the Vigo
    County Jail until at least April 18, 2018 because each time he appeared in court,
    it was noted that he appeared “in custody of the Vigo County Jail.” 
    Id. at 106-
    07, 111, 113. On April 18, 2018, when Demma admitted his probation
    violation, the trial court ordered him to serve the balance of his probation,
    which was two-years, six months, and twenty-two days. 
    Id. at 113.
    However,
    Demma was not given credit for any time served incarcerated prior to April 18,
    2018. Likewise, when Demma’s direct placement to home detention was
    revoked on July 3, 2018, he was given credit for eighty-four days for time served
    Court of Appeals of Indiana | Memorandum Decision 18A-CR-1804 | December 10, 2018   Page 4 of 5
    on home detention from May 22, 2018 through June 6, 2018 and for time
    served in jail from June 6, 2018 through July 2, 2018, but the trial court did not
    address credit time for Demma’s prior incarceration. Because the record is not
    clear regarding the amount of credit time Demma is entitled to, we remand to
    the trial court to make such a determination and award Demma the proper
    amount of credit time.
    [9]   Remanded.
    Riley, J., and Robb, J., concur.
    Court of Appeals of Indiana | Memorandum Decision 18A-CR-1804 | December 10, 2018   Page 5 of 5
    

Document Info

Docket Number: 18A-CR-1804

Filed Date: 12/10/2018

Precedential Status: Precedential

Modified Date: 12/10/2018