Tyler J. Collins v. State of Indiana (mem. dec.) ( 2017 )


Menu:
  • MEMORANDUM DECISION
    Pursuant to Ind. Appellate Rule 65(D),
    this Memorandum Decision shall not be                                 FILED
    regarded as precedent or cited before any                        Jun 07 2017, 8:56 am
    court except for the purpose of establishing                          CLERK
    the defense of res judicata, collateral                           Indiana Supreme Court
    Court of Appeals
    and Tax Court
    estoppel, or the law of the case.
    ATTORNEY FOR APPELLANT                                   ATTORNEYS FOR APPELLEE
    Brian A. Karle                                           Curtis T. Hill, Jr.
    Ball Eggleston, PC                                       Attorney General of Indiana
    Lafayette, Indiana
    Eric P. Babbs
    Deputy Attorney General
    Indianapolis, Indiana
    IN THE
    COURT OF APPEALS OF INDIANA
    Tyler J. Collins,                                        June 7, 2017
    Appellant-Defendant,                                     Court of Appeals Case No.
    79A05-1612-CR-2894
    v.                                               Appeal from the Tippecanoe
    Superior Court
    State of Indiana,                                        The Honorable Laura Zeman,
    Appellee-Plaintiff.                                      Judge
    Trial Court Cause No.
    79D04-1608-F6-800
    Brown, Judge.
    Court of Appeals of Indiana | Memorandum Decision 79A05-1612-CR-2894 |June 7, 2017        Page 1 of 9
    [1]   Tyler J. Collins appeals his sentence for unlawful possession of a syringe as a
    level 6 felony. Collins raises one issue which we revise and restate as whether
    his sentence is inappropriate in light of the nature of the offense and his
    character. We affirm.
    Facts and Procedural History
    [2]   On August 26, 2016, with intent to violate Ind. Code §§ 16-42-19 or §§ 35-48-4,
    Collins knowingly possessed or had under his control a syringe or needle or an
    instrument adapted for the use of heroin by injection.1 Collins possessed the
    syringe with the intent to inject heroin and used the syringe to do so.
    [3]   On August 31, 2016, the State charged him with Count I, unlawful possession
    of a syringe as a level 6 felony, and the court set his bond at $2,500. The State
    subsequently moved to amend the charging information to add Count II,
    possession of paraphernalia with a prior conviction, a class A misdemeanor,
    and the court granted the motion. In October 2016, Collins filed a motion for
    reduction of bond, and the court entered an order reducing his bond to $1,000
    with the requirement that he enroll in and successfully complete a substance
    abuse treatment program as recommended by Sycamore Springs. An entry in
    the chronological case summary (“CCS”) dated October 31, 2016, states a cash
    bond was entered in the clerk’s office, and entries in the CCS on November 2
    1
    Ind. Code § 16-42-19-18 provides “[a] person may not possess with intent to: (1) violate this chapter [the
    Indiana Legend Drug Act]; or (2) commit an offense described in IC 35-48-4; a hypodermic syringe or needle
    or an instrument adapted for the use of a controlled substance or legend drug by injection in a human being”
    and that a violation constitutes a level 6 felony.
    Court of Appeals of Indiana | Memorandum Decision 79A05-1612-CR-2894 |June 7, 2017               Page 2 of 9
    and 4, 2016, state that a report was filed by Sycamore Springs and that Collins
    showed proof of enrollment there.
    [4]   On November 4, 2016, the court held a guilty plea hearing at which Collins
    pled guilty to Count I, unlawful possession of a syringe as a level 6 felony, and
    the State agreed to forgo prosecution on Count II. Collins agreed that he had
    possession of a syringe, the syringe was an item used for the injection of a
    controlled substance, he possessed the syringe with the intent to inject heroin,
    that was a violation of Ind. Code § 35-48-4, and he did in fact use the syringe to
    inject heroin.
    [5]   On December 5, 2016, the court held a sentencing hearing. At the hearing,
    Collins’s counsel indicated that Collins would like to withdraw his guilty plea,
    and Collins stated that he had just come across a woman who indicated the
    syringes belonged to her. The court recounted the questions it had asked
    Collins at the guilty plea hearing and noted that an ambulance had been called
    and that but for that ambulance Collins would be dead, and Collins stated that
    he understood. The court denied Collins’s request to withdraw his plea.
    Collins indicated he had been diagnosed with bipolar disorder, manic
    depressive order, and general anxiety disorder, and he testified that when the
    doctor saw him regarding his social security disability “they determined that my
    spinal meningitis probably ate so much of brain that I am what they would
    classify as mildly retarded.” Transcript Volume 2 at 20-21. Collins indicated
    that he went to Sycamore Springs as a condition of his bond and that he wanted
    to obtain the treatment on his own as well. When asked if he had been
    Court of Appeals of Indiana | Memorandum Decision 79A05-1612-CR-2894 |June 7, 2017   Page 3 of 9
    compliant, Collins answered affirmatively and testified he received a shot of
    Vivitrol every twenty-eight to thirty-two days. When asked the next step in the
    program, he testified he attended five days a week, then there would be a step
    down to three days a week for so many weeks, then two days a week for so
    many weeks, and then one day a week and then hopefully after care.
    [6]   When asked “you owe Community Corrections money so you wouldn’t be able
    to . . . pay them and . . . that’s not really an option for you correct,” Collins
    replied “No, I collect Social Security Disability and . . . my dad just recently
    told me that since I’ve been straightening my act up he’s, they’re re-letting me
    live with them” and “therefore he was going to let me pay on the rent and . . . if
    I need to pay payments or whatever . . . to Community Corrections if need be
    then I got the support finally.” 
    Id. at 23.
    He indicated he owed Community
    Corrections $1,119 and his disability benefit was $656 per month. When asked
    what was different this time, Collins answered that “before [he] never actually
    wanted rehab” and he “just had three close friends go to heaven this year.” 
    Id. at 28.
    The State requested a sentence of two and one-half years, all executed,
    and that if the court elected to permit Collins to continue with treatment, his
    sentence be stayed upon his successful completion of treatment and probation.
    Collins requested that the remainder of his sentence after time served be
    suspended to probation. The court stated it would release the cash bond and
    $950 of the bond would apply toward the Community Corrections fee.
    [7]   The court found Collins’s criminal history, multiple petitions to revoke in past
    cases, and multiple failed attempts at rehabilitation and treatment to be
    Court of Appeals of Indiana | Memorandum Decision 79A05-1612-CR-2894 |June 7, 2017   Page 4 of 9
    aggravating circumstances. It sentenced him to two and one-half years
    executed to be served in Tippecanoe County Community Corrections and
    ordered that he was entitled to credit for sixty-five actual days plus sixty-five
    days good time credit. The court also ordered that, “if [Collins] is not accepted
    into Community Corrections or violates Community Corrections rules and
    removed from Community Corrections, [he] shall serve the balance of the
    executed sentence in the Tippecanoe County Jail or the Indiana Department of
    Correction [(“DOC”)].” Appellant’s Appendix Volume 2 at 36.2
    Discussion
    [8]   The issue is whether Collins’s sentence is inappropriate in light of the nature of
    the offense and his character. Ind. Appellate Rule 7(B) provides that we “may
    revise a sentence authorized by statute if, after due consideration of the trial
    court’s decision, [we find] that the sentence is inappropriate in light of the
    nature of the offense and the character of the offender.” Under this rule, the
    2
    On appeal, Collins states: “As of the date of this Appellant’s Brief, Collins was serving executed time in the
    Tippecanoe County Jail. See Tippecanoe County Jail, http://www.tippecanoe.in.gov/467/Current-Inmate-
    Listing (last visited March 4, 2017).” Appellant’s Brief at 6 n.3. In its appellee’s brief, the State responds:
    “Review of the website provided by Collins, as of the time the State files this brief, shows that his name is not
    currently listed as an inmate at the Tippecanoe County Jail. See http://www.tippecanoe.in.gov/467/
    Current-Inmate-Listing (viewed April 3, 2017).” Appellee’s Brief at 5 n.3. Our review reveals that the
    information under Collins’s name on Tippecanoe County’s website sets forth a booking date of May 5, 2017,
    and states, under “Current Status,” the phrase “No Hold,” which means “[i]f all eligibility requirements are
    met, inmate may be released on bond.” See http://www.tippecanoe.in.gov/467/Current-Inmate-Listing)
    (last visited May 24, 2017). The information also includes, under “Charge Details,” entries for “work release
    violation (jail use only),” with a corresponding scheduled court date of June 6, 2017, under the cause number
    from which this appeal arises, and “possession of methamphetamine” and “possession of salvia or synthetic
    cannabinoid.” 
    Id. The page
    also includes a disclaimer stating “[a]ll information has been derived from
    public records that are constantly undergoing change and is not warranted for content or accuracy.” 
    Id. Court of
    Appeals of Indiana | Memorandum Decision 79A05-1612-CR-2894 |June 7, 2017                   Page 5 of 9
    burden is on the defendant to persuade the appellate court that his or her
    sentence is inappropriate. Childress v. State, 
    848 N.E.2d 1073
    , 1080 (Ind. 2006).
    [9]    Collins asserts that his offense is no more or less egregious than the typical
    offense for which he was convicted, he victimized only himself through his
    conduct, and his maximum, fully-executed sentence is inappropriate. He
    argues he pled guilty without the benefit of a plea agreement, he took initiative
    during the time his case was pending to seek substance abuse treatment at
    Sycamore Springs, his forgery convictions occurred over ten years ago, the
    majority of his charges correlate with his addiction issues, his best opportunity
    to rehabilitate is with intensive substance abuse and mental health treatment
    rather than a maximum jail sentence, and he is a victim of mental illness and an
    ongoing battle with addition. He requests this court to revise his sentence to
    include time on probation during which meaningful mental health and
    substance abuse treatment may be obtained under the watchful eye of a
    probation officer.
    [10]   The State responds that Collins has a long criminal history consisting of felony
    and misdemeanor convictions and adjudications as well as probation violations
    and revocations and, despite these contacts with the criminal justice system and
    prior leniency, he has continued to commit criminal offenses. The State also
    asserts that Collins has not accepted responsibility for his actions and that he
    makes no argument there is a nexus between his mental health issues and the
    instant offense.
    Court of Appeals of Indiana | Memorandum Decision 79A05-1612-CR-2894 |June 7, 2017   Page 6 of 9
    [11]   Our review of the nature of the offense reveals that Collins, with intent to
    violate Ind. Code §§ 16-42-19 or §§ 35-48-4, knowingly possessed or had under
    his control a syringe for the use of heroin by injection. At the guilty plea
    hearing, Collins admitted that he used the syringe to inject heroin.
    [12]   Our review of the character of the offender reveals that Collins pled guilty
    without the benefit of a plea agreement and the State agreed to forgo
    prosecution of the charge for possession of paraphernalia with a prior
    conviction. According to the presentence investigation report (“PSI”), Collins
    was born on May 12, 1988, and has juvenile adjudications for truancy in 2001,
    battery resulting in bodily injury and residential entry in 2002, and theft and
    auto theft in 2003. Also as a juvenile, a petition for modification of disposition
    was filed due to Collins intimidating and threatening his teacher in May 2003,
    and the court granted the petition; a petition for modification of disposition was
    filed due to his taking his parents’ van without permission and providing a false
    name to police in September 2003, and he was ordered to complete home-based
    services; and a petition for modification of disposition was filed due to his
    pushing his mother into a wall, and the court granted the petition. As an adult,
    Collins was convicted of failure to stop after an accident resulting in non-
    vehicular damage as a class B misdemeanor in 2006; two counts of forgery as
    class C felonies, theft as a class D felony, and possession of marijuana as a class
    A misdemeanor in 2007; obtaining a controlled substance by fraud or deceit
    (conspiracy to commit) as a class D felony in February 2008; battery resulting
    in bodily injury as a class A misdemeanor in September 2008; possession of a
    Court of Appeals of Indiana | Memorandum Decision 79A05-1612-CR-2894 |June 7, 2017   Page 7 of 9
    narcotic drug (attempt to commit) and battery resulting in bodily injury (prior
    with same victim) as class D felonies, resisting law enforcement as a class A
    misdemeanor, and battery as a class B misdemeanor in 2012; driving while
    suspended (prior within ten years) as a class A misdemeanor in 2015; and
    possession of paraphernalia and knowingly or intentionally operating a motor
    vehicle without ever receiving a license as class C misdemeanors in 2016.
    [13]   In addition, the PSI indicates that Collins violated work release in 2006 by
    stealing from another work release participant and was transported to the
    Tippecanoe County Jail; a notice of work release rejection was filed in February
    2008 due to his possessing contraband and providing a false statement to a work
    release officer, and he was transported to jail; he tested positive for cocaine and
    marijuana in May 2008; a notice of home detention violation was filed in
    November 2008 due to his being found at a motel injecting cocaine, and he was
    remanded to jail; and a petition to revoke probation was filed in 2011 due to his
    testing positive for marijuana, and the petition was found true. The PSI further
    states Collins failed to report to the probation department after his guilty plea
    hearing in November 2016 and has a long history of non-compliance with
    community-based services. The PSI also observes that a presentence
    investigation report filed in another cause indicated that Collins had been
    diagnosed with bipolar disorder and manic depressive disorder at ten years of
    age, was diagnosed with generalized anxiety disorder more recently, lost
    hearing due to contracting spinal meningitis in 2000 and had surgeries related
    Court of Appeals of Indiana | Memorandum Decision 79A05-1612-CR-2894 |June 7, 2017   Page 8 of 9
    to his hearing loss, and reported a history of using and/or abusing alcohol,
    marijuana, cocaine, crack cocaine, methamphetamine, and heroin.
    [14]   After due consideration, we conclude that Collins has not sustained his burden
    of establishing that his sentence of two and one-half years to be served on
    community corrections if accepted is inappropriate in light of the nature of the
    offense and his character.
    Conclusion
    [15]   For the foregoing reasons, we affirm Collins’s sentence.
    [16]   Affirmed.
    May, J. and Pyle, J., concur.
    Court of Appeals of Indiana | Memorandum Decision 79A05-1612-CR-2894 |June 7, 2017   Page 9 of 9
    

Document Info

Docket Number: 79A05-1612-CR-2894

Filed Date: 6/7/2017

Precedential Status: Precedential

Modified Date: 6/7/2017