Anthony W. Shepard v. State of Indiana (mem. dec.) ( 2018 )


Menu:
  •       MEMORANDUM DECISION                                                            FILED
    ON REHEARING                                                              Jun 14 2018, 8:43 am
    Pursuant to Ind. Appellate Rule 65(D), this                                    CLERK
    Indiana Supreme Court
    Court of Appeals
    Memorandum Decision shall not be regarded as                                    and Tax Court
    precedent or cited before any court except for the
    purpose of establishing the defense of res judicata,
    collateral estoppel, or the law of the case.
    APPELLANT PRO SE                                          ATTORNEYS FOR APPELLEE
    Anthony W. Shepard                                        Curtis T. Hill, Jr.
    New Castle, Indiana                                       Attorney General of Indiana
    Angela N. Sanchez
    Supervising Deputy Attorney General
    Indianapolis, Indiana
    IN THE
    COURT OF APPEALS OF INDIANA
    Anthony W. Shepard,                                       June 14, 2018
    Appellant-Petitioner,                                     Court of Appeals Case No.
    33A01-1611-PC-2716
    v.                                                Appeal from the Henry Circuit
    Court.
    The Honorable Kit C. Dean Crane,
    State of Indiana,                                         Judge.
    Appellee-Respondent.                                      Trial Court Cause No.
    33C02-1608-PC-3
    Friedlander, Senior Judge
    [1]   The State has petitioned for rehearing of this Court’s decision in Shepard v. State,
    Cause No. 33A01-1611-PC-2716 (Ind. Ct. App. Mar. 22, 2018), in which we
    determined that Anthony Shepard is entitled to an evidentiary hearing on his
    Court of Appeals of Indiana | Memorandum Decision on Rehearing 33A01-1611-PC-2716 | June 14. 2018
    Page 1 of 2
    challenge to the voluntariness of his plea agreement. His guilty plea, and the
    resulting conviction, led to the revocation of his parole. We reversed the post-
    conviction court’s grant of summary disposition in favor of the State and
    remanded for further proceedings. We now grant the State’s petition for
    rehearing for the sole purpose of clarifying what is required on remand but
    affirm our opinion in all respects.
    [2]   The State does not challenge the Court’s conclusion that an evidentiary hearing
    is required. Instead, the State argues that the Henry Circuit Court is the wrong
    court to hear Shepard’s claims because he was convicted in Allen County.
    Henry County is merely Shepard’s county of incarceration, so the State asks the
    Court to order Shepard’s petition to be transferred to Allen County.
    [3]   We agree with the State. See Miller v. Lowrance, 
    629 N.E.2d 846
    , 847 (Ind.
    1994) (“State courts in the counties in which our prisons are located have no
    jurisdiction to examine or review a final judgment of a court of competent
    jurisdiction regular upon its face.”). As a result, we grant rehearing, affirm our
    previous Memorandum Decision, and direct the Henry Circuit Court to transfer
    Shepard’s petition to Allen County for further proceedings.
    Baker, J., and Najam, J., concur.
    Court of Appeals of Indiana | Memorandum Decision on Rehearing 33A01-1611-PC-2716 | June 14. 2018
    Page 2 of 2
    

Document Info

Docket Number: 33A01-1611-PC-2716

Filed Date: 6/14/2018

Precedential Status: Precedential

Modified Date: 6/14/2018