Kennedy v. Wilson ( 1923 )

McMahan, C. J.

A consideration of the questions presented by this appeal would require the .weighing of conflicting evidence. Appellants in effect concede this when they state that the award rests upon the testimony of appellee who they contend should not be believed, and when they urge us not to hold that “the unsupported evidence of a plaintiff in a case is sufficient” to sustain an award

The award is affirmed.