Bobrow v. Bobrow ( 2004 )

MATHIAS, Judge

concurring.

I am pleased to fully concur in Judge Vaidik's well-reasoned opinion.

I write only to express my concern that every day, there is much "confidential financial information" contained within doe-uments routinely filed and submitted in evidence in judicial proceedings (dissolution and otherwise) throughout Indiana, without any claim of privacy under IC 5-14-3. Until now, attorneys and their clients have correctly assumed that civil society would accord them the privacy customarily due such proceedings. It troubles me to add yet another pleading, a motion to seal, to the time and expense of obtaining a very common legal resolution, a dissolution of one's marriage, in Indiana. I am most displeased with this result and its effect upon parties, their attorneys, and courts, but I see no alternative.