Brandon VanBuskirk v. Elsie Seifert ( 2022 )


Menu:
  •                    IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF IOWA
    No. 21-0178
    Filed January 12, 2022
    BRANDON VANBUSKIRK,
    Plaintiff-Appellee,
    vs.
    ELSIE SEIFERT,
    Defendant-Appellant.
    ________________________________________________________________
    Appeal from the Iowa District Court for Cass County, Amy Zacharias, Judge.
    Elsie Seifert appeals provisions of a paternity decree. AFFIRMED.
    Theodore R. Wonio of Rasmussen, Nelson & Wonio, P.L.C., Atlantic, for
    appellant.
    Robert J. Engler of Cambridge Law Firm, P.L.C., Atlantic, for appellee.
    Considered by Bower, C.J., and Greer and Badding, JJ.
    2
    BOWER, Chief Judge.
    Elsie Seifert and Brandon VanBuskirk are the parents of a child born in
    August 2018. VanBuskirk was seventeen years old and still in high school when
    the child was born. Seifert was twenty. VanBuskirk filed a petition to establish
    paternity, custody, and related matters. Both parents sought physical care of the
    child. After a trial, the court observed, “To say that both parents have struggled
    with immaturity is an understatement.” Seifert appeals the decree placing the child
    in VanBuskirk’s physical care.
    This case was tried in equity, and therefore, our review is de novo. Iowa R.
    App. R. 6.907. Because the district court observes the parties and witnesses, we
    give weight to its fact and credibility findings, but we are not bound by them. Iowa
    R. App. P. 6.904(3)(g); see In re Marriage of Larsen, 
    912 N.W.2d 444
    , 448 (Iowa
    2018). Our first and governing consideration is the best interests of the child. Iowa
    R. App. P. 6.904(3)(o).
    The trial court accurately described each parent’s shortcomings and
    immaturity, assessed the credibility of witnesses, and found it notable that a
    witness who was once in favor of the child being placed in Seifert’s physical care
    testified the child was better cared for in VanBuskirk’s home. The court awarded
    joint legal custody, placed the child in VanBuskirk’s physical care, and ordered
    liberal visitation. On our de novo review, we agree with the trial court’s findings,
    and we therefore affirm.
    AFFIRMED.
    

Document Info

Docket Number: 21-0178

Filed Date: 1/12/2022

Precedential Status: Precedential

Modified Date: 1/12/2022