State of Iowa v. Loretta Leah MacKenzie ( 2016 )


Menu:
  •                     IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF IOWA
    No. 14-1528
    Filed November 9, 2016
    STATE OF IOWA,
    Plaintiff-Appellee,
    vs.
    LORETTA LEAH MACKENZIE,
    Defendant-Appellant.
    ________________________________________________________________
    Appeal from the Iowa District Court for Scott County, Henry W. Latham II,
    Judge.
    Loretta Mackenzie appeals from an order revoking her probation.
    AFFIRMED.
    Mark C. Smith, State Appellate Defender, and Patricia Reynolds, Assistant
    Appellate Defender, for appellant.
    Thomas J. Miller, Attorney General, and Jean C. Pettinger and Tyler J.
    Buller, Assistant Attorneys General, for appellee.
    Considered by Danilson, C.J., and Mullins and Bower, JJ.
    2
    DANILSON, Chief Judge.
    On September 14, 2011, Loretta Mackenzie pled guilty to manufacturing
    marijuana, admitting she assisted her husband when he was physically unable to
    do the chores related to growing marijuana plants he used for medicinal reasons
    to treat his angiosarcoma1 lesions.         The court accepted her plea and, on
    November 3, 2011, entered a deferred judgment.
    On July 10, 2013, a report of violation of probation was filed after a search
    warrant for the Mackenzie property was executed and officers found several
    marijuana plants and other items evidencing a grow operation. Mackenzie was
    then charged with manufacturing marijuana, possession of marijuana with intent
    to deliver, conspiracy to commit a nonforcible felony, and a drug-tax-stamp
    violation. The probation-revocation hearing was continued while proceedings in
    the related case proceeded. Following a jury trial, Mackenzie was found guilty of
    manufacturing marijuana, possessing drug paraphernalia, and failing to affix a
    drug tax stamp.
    A probation-revocation hearing was then held on September 9, 2014. On
    September 10, the court entered an order revoking Mackenzie’s probation and
    deferred judgment, and sentencing Mackenzie to a five-year indeterminate term
    in prison, which was suspended.2
    1
    “Angiosarcoma is a cancer of the inner lining of blood vessels, and it can occur in any
    area of the body. The disease most commonly occurs in the skin, breast, liver, spleen,
    and deep tissue.” https://www.google.com/#q=angiosarcoma+treatment (last visited
    October 18, 2016)
    2
    Mackenzie was placed on probation for two years by the order deferring judgment, but
    by a subsequent order filed October 18, 2013, her probation was extended one year to
    November 3, 2014.
    3
    On appeal,3 Mackenzie asserts the district court abused its discretion in
    revoking probation and “fail[ing] to properly take into account the mitigating
    factors in this case.”    While we sympathize with the family’s struggle with
    debilitating disease, we find no abuse of discretion by the district court.
    The district court did consider all the circumstances and, in light of
    Mackenzie’s care-taking role for her husband, suspended her sentence. Also
    considering the fact her violations arise from the same conduct upon which she
    was originally placed upon probation, the disposition imposed was just. Finding
    no abuse of discretion, we affirm. See State v. Thomas, 
    547 N.W.2d 223
    , 225
    (Iowa 1996) (noting we review for correction of errors of law, and when the
    sentence imposed does not exceed statutory limits and the sentencing court
    exercises its discretion on tenable and reasonable grounds, the sentence will not
    be set aside).
    AFFIRMED.
    3
    See State v. Farmer, 
    234 N.W.2d 89
    , 90–91 (Iowa 1975) (finding a defendant may
    appeal from an order revoking a deferred judgment and probation); see also State v.
    Temple, No. 15-1293, 
    2016 WL 4801610
    , at *1 (Iowa Ct. App. Sept. 14, 2016).
    

Document Info

Docket Number: 14-1528

Filed Date: 11/9/2016

Precedential Status: Precedential

Modified Date: 11/9/2016