In the Interest of J.W., Minor Child, L.B., Mother ( 2017 )


Menu:
  •                      IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF IOWA
    No. 17-0582
    Filed June 7, 2017
    IN THE INTEREST OF J.W.,
    Minor Child,
    L.B., Mother,
    Appellant.
    ________________________________________________________________
    Appeal from the Iowa District Court for Polk County, Rachael E. Seymour,
    District Associate Judge.
    Mother appeals following a dispositional order continuing placement of her
    child outside the home. AFFIRMED.
    Karmen R. Anderson of The Law Office of Karmen Anderson, Des
    Moines, for appellant mother.
    Thomas J. Miller, Attorney General, and Mary A. Triick, Assistant Attorney
    General, for appellee State.
    Michael J. Bandstra of Bandstra Law Office, Des Moines, guardian ad
    litem for minor child.
    Considered by Vogel, P.J., and Doyle and McDonald, JJ.
    2
    MCDONALD, Judge.
    The mother pursues this appeal following the entry of an order
    adjudicating her child, J.W., in need of assistance and the entry of a disposition
    order placing the child in out-of-home placement under the supervision of the
    Iowa Department of Human Services. The mother raises only a single issue in
    this appeal—whether the juvenile court abused its discretion in denying a motion
    to change venue.
    Our review of the juvenile “court’s decision to grant or deny a change of
    venue [is] for an abuse of discretion.” In re D.A., No. 06-0255, 
    2006 WL 931425
    ,
    at *2 (Iowa Ct. App. Apr. 12, 2006) (citing In re S.D., 
    671 N.W.2d 522
    , 527 (Iowa
    Ct. App. 2003)).    “In order to show an abuse of discretion, a party must
    demonstrate the court exercised its discretion on grounds or for reasons clearly
    untenable or to an extent clearly unreasonable.” In re E.C., No. 13-1090, 
    2013 WL 5291969
    , at *3 (Iowa Ct. App. Sept. 18, 2013) (citing In re Estate of Olson,
    
    479 N.W.2d 610
    , 613 (Iowa Ct. App. 1991)).
    The Iowa Code provides, “Venue for child in need of assistance
    proceedings shall be in the judicial district where the child is found or in the
    judicial district of the child’s residence.” 
    Iowa Code § 232.62
    (1) (2016). The
    juvenile court may transfer a proceeding “to the juvenile court of any county
    having venue at any stage in the proceedings” for two reasons. 
    Iowa Code § 232.62
    (2). First, “[w]hen it appears that the best interests of the child or the
    convenience of the proceedings shall be served by a transfer.”        
    Iowa Code § 232.62
    (2)(a). Second, “[w]ith the consent of the receiving court, the court may
    3
    transfer the case to the court of the county where the child is found.” 
    Iowa Code § 232.62
    (2)(b).
    Here, the guardian ad litem moved to change venue of this assistance
    proceeding from Polk County, in the Fifth Judicial District, to Union County, also
    in the Fifth Judicial District. The mother joined in the motion. The juvenile court
    denied the motion to change venue for a variety of reasons.         Primarily, the
    mother was already involved in another assistance proceeding in Polk County
    involving two older children. She would have to attend hearings, meetings, and
    appointments in Polk County for that case. In addition, although the child at
    issue resided in Union County, it was unclear whether the placement was long-
    term. Also, the mother and father’s housing was unstable. The mother, on
    several occasions, changed residences between Polk County and Union County.
    The juvenile court reasoned there was no need to change venue when the
    mother’s housing situation was unstable and she was likely to return to Polk
    County.   We cannot conclude the juvenile court’s exercise of discretion was
    clearly untenable or unreasonable.
    AFFIRMED.
    

Document Info

Docket Number: 17-0582

Filed Date: 6/7/2017

Precedential Status: Precedential

Modified Date: 4/17/2021