State of Iowa v. Robert Michael Aguirre ( 2016 )

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF IOWA
No. 16-0022
Filed December 21, 2016
STATE OF IOWA,
Plaintiff-Appellee,
vs.
ROBERT MICHAEL AGUIRRE,
Defendant-Appellant.
________________________________________________________________
Appeal from the Iowa District Court for Scott County, Henry W. Latham II,
Judge.
Robert Aguirre appeals his conviction and sentence for homicide by
vehicle, driving while intoxicated, following a jury trial. AFFIRMED.
Mark C. Smith, State Appellate Defender, and Melinda J. Nye, Assistant
Appellate Defender, for appellant.
Thomas J. Miller, Attorney General, and Timothy M. Hau, Assistant
Attorney General, for appellee.
Considered by Danilson, C.J., and Mullins and Bower, JJ.
2
MULLINS, Judge.
Robert Aguirre appeals his conviction and sentence for homicide by
vehicle, driving while intoxicated, following a jury trial. He argues (1) the
evidence was insufficient to prove the necessary causal connection between his
intoxicated driving and the death of the victim and (2) his trial counsel was
ineffective in failing to request a jury instruction on scope of liability.
The State responds there were several facts demonstrating Aguirre’s
intoxication level of .238 blood alcohol concentration showed impairment—
including bloodshot eyes, slow and slurred speech, confused thinking, and failure
of field sobriety tests—and established sufficient facts upon which a jury could
find Aguirre’s intoxicated driving caused the death of the victim. The State also
argues that, under the facts of this case, the jury was properly instructed on
causation and trial counsel was not ineffective for not asking the trial court to
instruct on scope of liability.
“We review sufficiency-of-the-evidence challenges for correction of errors
at law.” State v. Vance, 790 N.W.2d 775, 783 (Iowa 2010). “We will sustain the
jury’s verdict if it is supported by substantial evidence.” Id. “Evidence is
substantial if it would convince a rational trier of fact the defendant is guilty
beyond a reasonable doubt.” Id. (quoting State v. Jorgensen, 758 N.W.2d 830,
834 (Iowa 2008)).
We review claims of ineffective assistance of counsel de novo. See State
v. Thorndike, 860 N.W.2d 316, 319 (Iowa 2015). We generally preserve
ineffective-assistance-of-counsel claims for postconviction relief but will consider
3
the claims on direct appeal if the record is adequate. See State v. Clay, 824
N.W.2d 488, 494 (Iowa 2012).
We find substantial evidence to support the jury verdict that Aguirre’s
intoxicated driving was the cause of the death of the victim and affirm on this
issue. See Iowa Ct. R. 21.26(a), (b). The record is adequate for us to determine
trial counsel was not ineffective in failing to ask the trial court to instruct on scope
of liability, and we affirm on this issue. See Iowa Ct. R. 21.23(a), (e).
AFFIRMED.