In Re Nortel Networks Corp. Securities Litigation , 360 F. Supp. 2d 1373 ( 2005 )


Menu:
  • 360 F. Supp. 2d 1373 (2005)

    In re NORTEL NETWORKS CORP. SECURITIES LITIGATION.

    No. MDL-1659.

    Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation.

    February 22, 2005.

    *1374 Before WM. TERRELL HODGES, Chairman, JOHN F. KEENAN, D. LOWELL JENSEN, J. FREDERICK MOTZ, ROBERT L. MILLER, Jr., KATHRYN H. VRATIL and DAVID R. HANSEN, Judges of the Panel.

    TRANSFER ORDER

    WM. TERRELL HODGES, Chairman.

    This litigation currently consists of 28 actions in the Southern District of New York, now consolidated, and an action in the Central District of California as listed on the attached Schedule A. Before the Panel is a motion, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1407, brought by defendant Nortel Networks Corporation (Nortel) and individual defendants Frank A. Dunn and Michael J. Gollogly for coordinated or consolidated pretrial proceedings of these actions in the Southern District of New York. Plaintiff in the Central District of California action does not oppose transfer to the Southern District of New York for coordinated or consolidated pretrial proceedings.

    On the basis of the papers filed and hearing session held, the Panel finds that these 29 actions involve common questions of fact, and that centralization under Section 1407 in the Southern District of New York will serve the convenience of the parties and witnesses and promote the just and efficient conduct of this litigation. All actions share allegations that the moving defendants and others, among other things, made misleading statements about Nortel's financial performance and prospects based on an earnings management scheme that involved the improper provisioning and releasing of reserves and caused investors to trade in Nortel stock at inflated or distorted prices. Centralization under Section 1407 is thus necessary in order to eliminate duplicative discovery, prevent inconsistent pretrial rulings, and conserve the resources of the parties, their counsel and the judiciary.

    Given the agreement of the moving defendants and the responding plaintiff in the lone outlying action to transfer under Section 1407 to the Southern District of New York, this district stands out as an appropriate transferee forum for this litigation. We note that 28 actions are already pending in the Southern District of New York and that pretrial proceedings are progressing in that district.

    IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1407, the Central District of California action listed on Schedule A is transferred to the Southern District of New York and, with the consent of that court, assigned to the Honorable Loretta A. Preska for coordinated or consolidated pretrial proceedings with the actions listed on Schedule A and pending in that district.

    SCHEDULE A

    MDL-1659 — In re Nortel Networks Corp. Securities Litigation

    Central District of California

    Michael F. Walsh v. Nortel Networks Corp., et al., C.A. No. 2:04-6216

    Southern District of New York

    In re Nortel Networks Corporation Securities Litigation, C.A. No. 1:04-2115

    Cary Savitz v. Nortel Networks Corp., et al., C.A. No. 1:04-2164

    Mark D. Cornfield, et al. v. Nortel Networks Corp., et al., C.A. No. 1:04-2189

    William Berger v. Nortel Networks Corp., et al., C.A. No. 1:04-2190

    Milton Pfeiffer v. Nortel Networks Corp., et al., C.A. No. 1:04-2233

    Indiana Electrical Workers Pension Trust Fund IBEW v. Nortel Networks Corp., et al., C.A. No. 1:04-2246

    *1375 Steel Workers' Pension Trust v. Nortel Networks Corp., et al., C.A. No. 1:04-2249

    Thomas Rotchford v. Nortel Networks Corp., et al., C.A. No. 1:04-2342

    Andrew Newman v. Nortel Networks Corp., et al., C.A. No. 1:04-2360

    David George Parkinson v. Nortel Networks Corp., et al., C.A. No. 1:04-2372

    Ilene Armour v. Nortel Networks Corp., et al., C.A. No. 1:04-2503

    Julie Kapsch v. Nortel Networks Corp., et al., C.A. No. 1:04-2507

    Leonard Semerad v. Nortel Networks Corp., et al., C.A. No. 1:04-2532

    Douglas Powell v. Nortel Networks Corp., et al., C.A. No. 1:04-2546

    Dennis E. Arneson v. Nortel Networks Corp., et al., C.A. No. 1:04-2554

    Bernard Lubinsky v. Nortel Networks Corp., et al., C.A. No. 1:04-2572

    Kent Wayne Smith v. Nortel Networks Corp., et al., C.A. No. 1:04-2695

    Rolland Schach v. Nortel Networks Corp., et al., C.A. No. 1:04-2738

    Eric D. Bell v. Nortel Networks Corp., et al., C.A. No. 1:04-3056

    Peter Springer v. Nortel Networks Corp., et al., C.A. No. 1:04-3101

    Mary Urlrick v. Nortel Networks Corp., et al., C.A. No. 1:04-3158

    Bobby D. Torres v. Nortel Networks Corp., et al., C.A. No. 1:04-3570

    The Trustees of The Ontario Public Service Employees' Union Pension Plan Trust Fund v. Nortel Networks Corp., et al., C.A. No. 1:04-3572

    Jose I. Galindez v. Nortel Networks Corp., et al., C.A. No. 1:04-3597

    Kamran Mirza v. Nortel Networks Corp., et al., C.A. No. 1:04-3615

    Susan Daniels, et al. v. Nortel Networks Corp., et al., C.A. No. 1:04-3726

    Stichting Pensioenfonds ABP v. Nortel Networks Corp., et al., C.A. No. 1:04-3727

    Locals 302 and 612 of the International Union of Operating Engineers-Employers Construction Industry Retirement Trust, et al. v. James J. Blanchard, et al., C.A. No. 1:04-5954

Document Info

Docket Number: MDL-1659

Citation Numbers: 360 F. Supp. 2d 1373, 2005 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 2875, 2005 WL 471145

Judges: Hodges, Keenan, Jensen, Motz, Miller, Vratil, Hansen

Filed Date: 2/22/2005

Precedential Status: Precedential

Modified Date: 10/19/2024