Jahren v. Palmer , 71 Kan. 841 ( 1905 )

Per Curiam:

The agency of Mr. Palmer for his wife was testified to by him, and such testimony was admissible. There was no attempt to prove the agency by the declaration of the agent. We think there was sufficient evidence of the agency to justify the court in finding that fact to exist. We cannot say that the judgment of the court below was not sustained by the evidence. It is affirmed.