-
Per Curiam: This is an appeal by Ragsdale from a decision overruling his motion for a new trial and to tax the costs of the receivership to the plaintiffs. It was submitted, together with cause number 18,272, in which an opinion revérsing the judgment of the district court was handed down June 7, 1913. (Dry Goods Co. v. Woodruff, 89 Kan. 821, 132 Pac. 1005.)
(See, also, Ellis v. Woodruff, 88 Kan. 734, 129 Pac. 1193.)
The judgment in this case will be affirmed.
Document Info
Docket Number: No. 18,228
Filed Date: 7/29/1913
Precedential Status: Precedential
Modified Date: 11/9/2024