Sharp v. Pittsburg Coca Cola Bottling Co. , 180 Kan. 845 ( 1957 )

Price, J.,

dissenting: No one questions the right of plaintiff to be compensated adequately for the damage sustained, but under the evidence in this case it is my opinion the verdict is so grossly excessive as to indicate clearly that it was rendered under the influence of passion and prejudice, thus entitling defendant to a new trial.