John David Inman v. Kentucky Bar Association ( 2022 )


Menu:
  •                                                              TO BE PUBLISHED
    Supreme Court of Kentucky
    2021-SC-0570-KB
    JOHN DAVID INMAN                                                        MOVANT
    V.                            IN SUPREME COURT
    KENTUCKY BAR ASSOCIATION                                          RESPONDENT
    OPINION AND ORDER
    On December 17, 2021, John David Inman (Inman), moved this Court for
    the entry of an order suspending him from the practice of law for 30 days,
    probated for one year with conditions, for violating SCR 3.130(8.4)(b), as
    charged in KBA File No. 20-DIS-0246. Thereafter, the Kentucky Bar
    Association (KBA) filed a response that they have no objection to the order as
    requested. This Court hereby enters said 30 day suspension, probated for one
    year with conditions, for violating SCR 3.130(8.4)(b).
    I. BACKGROUND
    Inman, KBA member number 95576, was admitted to practice law in the
    Commonwealth on October 18, 2013. His address is 651 Comanche Trail,
    Frankfort, KY 40601.
    On June 28, 2020, Inman and his former fiancée were involved in a
    domestic dispute. She was treated at the hospital for bruising she received
    around her left eye, she also claims to have temporarily lost consciousness.
    Inman was arrested as a result. He was charged with Assault 4th Degree
    (Domestic Violence) Minor Injury, a Class A Misdemeanor. Inman1 entered an
    Alford plea to the assault charge on December 8, 2020. He was sentenced to
    180 days in jail, suspended for 12 months on conditions that he pay restitution
    and have no contact with the victim for a year. Inman provided the court with
    proof of payment of restitution on May 11, 2021.
    As a result of his criminal action, Inman sought the help of a therapist
    and he was diagnosed with Adjustment Disorder with a Specificity of Anxiety.
    Inman’s mental health condition manifested itself in the form of hypervigilance
    and extreme anxiety, resulting in him sometimes overreacting to non-dire
    stressors and/or causing him to act irrationally. Inman has started therapy
    and has been successful in developing healthier, more appropriate responses to
    stressors.
    Inman was also having issues with alcohol. He started attending
    Alcoholics Anonymous. He and his ex-wife reached an agreement, concerning
    custody of their child, that Inman submit to monitoring of his blood alcohol
    content twice daily for three months.
    1   Commonwealth v. Inman, Franklin District Court, Case No. 20-M-585.
    2
    Inman was diagnosed with adult onset Attention Deficit Hyperactivity
    Disorder (ADHD), this also affected the anxiety and stress he experienced with
    his Adjustment Disorder.
    Inman has been managing his conditions with daily prescribed
    medication. He has noted a significant difference in his daily stress level, his
    ability to be productive in his personal and professional settings. He also notes
    significant changes in his ability to think and act more rationally.
    Inman agrees to also submit to an assessment with the Kentucky
    Lawyers Assistance Program (KYLAP).
    II. CHARGES
    Count 1. Violation of SCR 3.130(8.4)(b) – “It is a professional misconduct
    for a lawyer to . . . commit a criminal act that reflects adversely on the lawyer’s
    honesty, trustworthiness or fitness as a lawyer in other respects.” Movant
    admits his conduct violated this rule.
    III.        ANALYSIS
    In support of the 30 day suspension, the KBA cites Kentucky Bar Ass’n v.
    Hemming 
    152 S.W.3d 865
     (Ky. 2005). Hemming assaulted his mother and
    caused minor injuries. He pled guilty to 4th degree assault and he was
    sentenced to 12-month term of incarceration, 90 days to serve, the remainder
    probated for two years of supervised probation. Hemming served his 90 days
    in home incarceration, he also underwent 30 days of inpatient domestic
    violence offender treatment, substance and alcohol evaluation and treatment,
    3
    and a psychiatric evaluation and treatment. Hemming self-reported to the KBA
    and expressed his regret and cooperation with the investigation.
    Inman also reported his conviction to KBA and has cooperated with the
    investigation. The proposed one-year probation is the same length as in his
    criminal case.
    Inman admits that he violated SCR 3.130(8.4)(b). Inman and the KBA
    agree to an order suspending him from the practice of law for 30 days,
    probated for one year with conditions.
    Therefore, the Court Orders:
    1.) Inman is hereby suspended from the practice of law for 30 days,
    probated for one year.
    2.) Inman is hereby ordered to pay all costs of these proceedings
    pursuant to SCR 3.450.
    3.) Inman shall not commit any crimes, including misdemeanors or
    felonies.
    4.) Inman shall not receive any disciplinary charges against him.
    5.) Within 10 days of the entry of this order, Inman must contact KYLAP
    to schedule an assessment, complete the assessment and comply with
    any recommendations made by KYLAP. Inman must also sign an
    authorization allowing Office of Bar Counsel (OBC) to directly
    communicate with and obtain information from the Director of KYLAP.
    Inman shall also provide quarterly reports to the OBC showing his
    4
    compliance with any terms and conditions set by KYLAP regarding his
    mental health assessment.
    6.) Inman agrees that if he violates any terms of probation within one
    year of the date of the Court order, the KBA may file a motion with the
    Court requesting the issuance of a show cause order directing Inman
    to show cause, if any, why the 30-day suspension should not be
    imposed.
    All sitting. All concur.
    ENTERED: February 24, 2022.
    ______________________________________
    CHIEF JUSTICE
    5
    

Document Info

Docket Number: 2021 SC 0570

Filed Date: 2/22/2022

Precedential Status: Precedential

Modified Date: 2/24/2022