James M. Cawood v. Kentucky Bar Association ( 2015 )


Menu:
  •                                                                 TO BE PUBLISHED
    oi5uprrittr Court of qcfirnfuritv
    2014-SC-000664-KB
    JAMES M. CAWOOD                                                            MOVANT
    KBA MEMBER NO. 87653
    V.                             IN SUPREME COURT
    KENTUCKY BAR ASSOCIATION                                             RESPONDENT
    OPINION AND ORDER
    Movant, James M. Cawood, III, moves this Court to impose a suspension
    from the practice of law in the Commonwealth of Kentucky for a period of one
    (1) year, to be probated for a period of three (3) years, subject to conditions.
    Movant was admitted to practice law in the Commonwealth of Kentucky on
    May 3, 1999. Movant's Kentucky Bar Association ("KBA") member number is
    87653 and his bar roster address is 470 Lakeview Drive, Unit 4, Wilder,
    Kentucky 41071.
    KBA File 20173
    In January of 2008, Martha Miller retained Movant to represent her in a
    lawsuit stemming from the death of her son. For approximately one and one-
    half years, Movant represented Ms. Miller without issue. However, in the latter
    half of 2009, Movant failed to advance Ms. Miller's case. Movant also failed to
    meet Ms. Miller for scheduled appointments, providing her with no advanced
    notice of his cancellations. Despite Movant's complete abandonment of the
    case, he would not refund Ms. Miller the unearned portion of his fees.
    Consequently, Ms. Miller filed a bar complaint with the KBA. The bar
    complaint was mailed to Movant's bar roster address along with a request for
    additional information, but was subsequently returned to the KBA as
    "Unclaimed." The Office of Bar Counsel attempted to mail the bar complaint
    and request for additional information to an alternative address in November
    and December of 2011. However, both mailings were returned to the KBA
    marked "Unclaimed" and "Unable to Forward." Finally, on February 13, 2012,
    service was made upon Movant via the Executive Director of the KBA pursuant
    to Supreme Court Rule ("SCR") 3.175(2).
    On November 8, 2012, the Inquiry Commission issued a six-count
    Charge against Movant alleging the following violations of the Rules of
    Professional Conduct: Count I, SCR 3.130-1.3 (failure to diligently represent
    client); Count II, SCR 3.130-1.4(a)(2) (failure to reasonably consult with client
    about the means by which the client's objectives are to be accomplished);
    Count III, SCR 3.130-1.4(a)(3) (failure to keep client reasonably informed);
    Count IV, SCR 3.130-1.16(d) (failure to protect client's interest upon
    termination of representation, including refunding any advanced payment or
    fee); Count V, SCR 3.130-8.1(b) (failure to respond to a lawful demand for
    information from a disciplinary authority); and SCR 3.175(a) (failing to
    maintain a current address with the KBA).
    KBA File 20736
    Movant's IOLTA Trust Account ("account") held at Huntington National
    Bank was overdrawn on December 14, 2011, due to a transaction in the
    2
    amount of $24.50. Thereafter, Movant's account incurred overdraft fees,
    leaving a negative balance of -$115.38. On January 3, 2012, another
    transaction was attempted on Movant's already overdrawn account. At that
    time, Movant's account held a negative balance of -$151.38. On December 29,
    2011, and on January 11, 2012, the Office of Bar Council sent correspondence
    to Movant's bar roster address requesting that he provide the KBA with written
    explanation as to why the account was overdrawn. The letters were returned to
    the KBA marked "Not Deliverable as Addressed" and "Unable to Forward."
    On June 3, 2013, the Inquiry Commission issued a Charge against
    Movant alleging a violation of SCR 3.130-1.15(a) (escrow account violations)
    and SCR 3.175(a) (failing to maintain a current address with the KBA). On
    June 25, 2013, Movant filed his response to the Charge and admitted to
    unknowingly violating the Rules of Professional Conduct. On April 7, 2014,
    KBA Case Files 20173 and 20736 were consolidated.
    Movant admits to the misconduct as described in both Charges. In an
    effort to resolve this consolidated disciplinary action, Movant has negotiated a
    sanction with the Office of Bar Council pursuant to SCR 3.480(2). The
    negotiated sanction suspends Movant from the practice of law in the
    Commonwealth of Kentucky for a period of one (1) year, probated for a period of
    three (3) years, subject to the following conditions: Movant must continue to
    comply with the terms of the Kentucky Lawyer Assistance Program ("KYLAP")
    Supervision Agreement; Movant must sign an authorization, waiver, and
    release form allowing the KBA and Office of Bar Counsel to access and review
    3
    his KYLAP records and medical and mental health records; Movant shall return
    any documents belonging to Martha Miller along with unearned fees in the
    amount of $256.04; and Movant must attend the Ethics and Professionalism
    Enhancement Program.
    The KBA agrees that the recommended discipline is appropriate and
    supported by similar cases. In support of its position, the KBA directs the
    Court to Kentucky Bar Ass'n v. Gabbard, 
    172 S.W.3d 395
    (Ky. 2005), Kentucky
    Bar Ass'n v. Koury, 
    311 S.W.3d 251
    (Ky. 2010), and Kentucky Bar Ass'n v.
    McCartney, 
    232 S.W.3d 516
    (Ky. 2007). In Gabbard, the disciplined attorney
    committed eight counts of disciplinary misconduct, stemming from two
    
    Charges. 172 S.W.3d at 396
    . The disciplinary actions were based on
    Gabbard's failure to perform work on behalf of two separate clients.    
    Id. 396- 97.
    He also failed to return unearned fees and provide the KBA with his
    correct address. 
    Id. at 397.
    Gabbard received a one-year suspension from the
    practice of law. 
    Id. at 399.
    In Koury, the disciplined attorney was paid a retainer fee of $1,500 to
    represent his client in a traffic 
    matter. 311 S.W.3d at 252
    . The client was
    unable to contact or recoup his retainer fee after a warrant was issued for his
    arrest due to Koury's failure to appear in court on his behalf.   
    Id. The KBA
    subsequently discovered that Koury provided it with an incorrect address. 
    Id. at 253.
    Ultimately, we sentenced Koury to a one-year suspension.       
    Id. It is
    important to note that the suspension was based on Koury's recent and
    lengthy disciplinary history. 
    Id. 4 Lastly,
    in. McCartney, the attorney was disciplined in two separate
    disciplinary 
    actions. 232 S.W.3d at 516
    . In both cases, McCartney failed to
    inform his clients that he had abandoned his law practice after being
    suspended from the practice of law for not paying his bar dues. 
    Id. at 516-17.
    McCartney not only failed to return his clients' unearned fees, but he also
    failed to give the KBA a correct address.       
    Id. McCartney was
    suspended from
    the practice of law for one year. 
    Id. at 518.
    It is in this Court's discretion to accept the negotiated sanction.
    Anderson v. Kentucky Bar Ass'n, 
    262 S.W.3d 636
    , 638 (Ky. 2008). All three of
    the aforementioned cases present us with similar misconduct, wherein the
    attorneys failed to adequately represent and communicate with their clients.
    After doing so, the attorneys failed to return unearned fees. Moreover, the
    attorneys did not provide the KBA with correct addresses. In each case, the
    attorney received a suspension from the practice of law for one year. Likewise,
    a one-year suspension is proper in the case before us. However, we agree with
    the Movant and the KBA that a probated suspension is more fitting in this
    situation considering that, unlike in Gabbard and McCartney, Movant's
    misconduct affected only one client.
    In addition, Movant has presented mitigating factors to persuade us that
    a one-year suspension, probated for three (3) years is appropriate. These
    factors illustrate that Movant suffered from an intense addiction to opiates
    during the time period in which the misconduct occurred. He has since sought
    and completed rehabilitative services at Transitions, Inc., in Northern
    5
    Kentucky. Movant has also executed a Supervision Agreement with the
    Kentucky Lawyer Assistance Program ("KYLAP") and is currently compliant
    with that agreement.
    Based on this mitigating evidence, and in light of similar discipline
    imposed for analogous misconduct, this Court finds that the consensual
    discipline proposed by Movant and agreed to by the KBA is appropriate.
    Therefore, Movant's motion for a probated suspension from the practice of law
    is hereby granted.
    ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED THAT:
    1. Movant, James M. Cawood, KBA Member No. 87653, is found guilty of
    the above-described and admitted violations of the Rules of Professional
    Conduct.
    2. Movant is hereby suspended from the practice of law in this
    Commonwealth for a period of one (1) year, probated for a period of three
    (3) years.
    3. Movant's probated suspension is conditioned upon him adhering to the
    terms of the KYLAP Supervision Agreement. Within twenty (20) days
    from the date of entry of this Order, Movant must execute and provide
    the KBA and Office of Bar Counsel with an authorization, waiver, and
    release form allowing the KBA and Office of Bar Counsel to access and
    review Movant's KYLAP records and medical and mental health records.
    4. Movant's probated suspension is also conditioned upon his full
    compliance with the terms and recommendations of the KYLAP
    6
    Supervision Agreement.
    5. Movant shall return any documents belonging to Martha Miller along
    with unearned fees in the amount of $256.04 within thirty (30) days from
    entry of this Order.
    6. Movant must attend and successfully complete the Ethics and
    Professionalism Enhancement Program and may not claim Continued
    Learning and Education credits for attending the program.
    7. Movant shall not receive any additional disciplinary charges during the
    three (3) year probationary period.
    8. If Movant fails to comply with any of the terms of discipline as set forth
    in this Order, upon the Office of Bar Counsel's motion, the Court shall
    impose the one (1) year period of suspension and require client
    notification under SCR 3.390(b).
    9. Pursuant to SCR 3.450, Movant is directed to pay all costs associated
    with these disciplinary proceedings in the amount of $232.17, for which
    execution may issue from this Court upon finality of this Order.
    All sitting. All concur.
    ENTERED: April 2, 2015.
    CHIEF JUSTICE
    

Document Info

Docket Number: 2014-SC-000664-KB

Judges: Minton

Filed Date: 3/30/2015

Precedential Status: Precedential

Modified Date: 11/14/2024