Kentucky Bar Association v. Harold McClure Schwarz, III ( 2020 )


Menu:
  •                                                                TO BE PUBLISHED
    Supreme Court of Kentucky
    2020-SC-0318-KB
    KENTUCKY BAR ASSOCIATION                                                  MOVANT
    V.                            IN SUPREME COURT
    HAROLD MCCLURE SCHWARZ III                                          RESPONDENT
    OPINION AND ORDER
    On April 22, 2020, the Ohio Supreme Court indefinitely suspended
    Harold McClure Schwarz III1 from the practice of law. Thereafter, the Kentucky
    Bar Association (KBA) filed a petition with this Court asking that we impose
    reciprocal discipline pursuant to SCR 3.435. We ordered Schwarz to show
    cause why we should not impose such discipline and he failed to respond to
    that order. Because Schwarz failed to show cause as to why we should not
    impose reciprocal discipline, this Court hereby imposes an indefinite
    suspension from the practice of law in the Commonwealth of Kentucky, as
    consistent with the order of the Ohio Supreme Court.
    1Schwarz was admitted to the practice of law in the Commonwealth of
    Kentucky on July 19, 2010. His bar roster address is listed as 3475 Ridgewood Road,
    Akron, Ohio 44333, and his KBA number is 93585.
    I. BACKGROUND
    In October 2018, Schwarz was charged by a grand jury of two felonies—
    importuning, a fifth degree felony, and attempted unlawful sexual conduct with
    a minor, a fourth-degree felony. In February 2019, Schwarz pleaded guilty to
    importuning for soliciting an undercover law-enforcement officer who posed as
    a 15-year-old boy. Schwarz had several sexually-charged conversations with
    the undercover officer and made plans to meet the boy. According to the terms
    of the plea, the attempted unlawful sexual conduct with a minor charge was
    dismissed.
    The Supreme Court of Ohio originally suspended Schwarz on an interim
    basis on March 22, 2019, and then indefinitely suspended him from the
    practice of law on April 22, 2020. At his disciplinary hearing in Ohio, Schwarz
    admitted his conduct. Ohio’s Board of Professional Conduct found that he
    violated its Rule 8.4(b), which prohibits a lawyer from engaging in conduct that
    reflects adversely on the lawyer’s honesty or trustworthiness and Rule 8.4(h)
    which prohibits a lawyer from engaging in conduct that adversely reflects on
    the lawyer’s fitness to practice law. While Kentucky does not have a rule
    8.4(h), our Supreme Court Rule (SCR) 3.130-8.4(b) combines Ohio’s Rules 8.4
    (b) and (h), providing that “it is professional misconduct for a lawyer to:
    commit a criminal act that reflects adversely on a lawyer’s honesty,
    trustworthiness or fitness as a lawyer in other respects.
    However, even if these rules did not align, SCR 3.130–3.4(c) states that a
    lawyer shall not “knowingly disobey an obligation under the rules of a tribunal
    2
    except for an open refusal based on an assertion that no valid obligation
    exists.” Furthermore, we have held “SCR 3.435 does not require that the rules
    be identical to allow for the imposition of reciprocal discipline.” KBA v.
    Meehan, 
    237 S.W.3d 546
    , 547 (Ky. 2007).
    II. ANALYSIS
    If an attorney licensed to practice law in this Commonwealth receives
    discipline in another jurisdiction, SCR 3.435(4) generally requires this Court to
    impose identical discipline. Furthermore, SCR 3.435(4)(c) requires this Court
    to recognize that “[i]n all other respects” a final adjudication of misconduct in
    another jurisdiction establishes conclusively the same misconduct for purposes
    of a disciplinary proceeding in Kentucky. Pursuant to SCR 3.435(4), we impose
    reciprocal discipline as Schwarz failed to prove “by substantial evidence: (a) a
    lack of jurisdiction or fraud in the [Ohio] disciplinary proceeding, or (b) that
    misconduct established warrants substantially different discipline in this
    State.”
    III. ORDER
    Having failed to timely show sufficient cause, it is hereby ORDERED as
    follows:
    1. Schwarz is hereby indefinitely suspended from the practice of law
    in Kentucky until such a time that he fulfills the requirements of
    the Ohio Supreme Court’s order suspending him indefinitely in
    that state; and
    3
    2. In accordance with SCR 3.450, Schwarz shall pay all costs
    associated with these proceedings; and
    3. Pursuant to SCR 3.390, Schwarz shall, within ten (10) days from
    the entry of this Opinion and Order, notify all clients, in writing, of
    his inability to represent them; notify, in writing, all courts in
    which he has matters pending of his suspension from the practice
    of law; and furnish copies of all letters of notice to the Office of Bar
    Counsel. Furthermore, to the extent possible, Schwarz shall
    immediately cancel and cease any advertising activities in which he
    is engaged.
    All sitting. All concur.
    ENTERED: October 29, 2020.
    ______________________________________
    CHIEF JUSTICE
    4
    

Document Info

Docket Number: 2020 SC 0318

Filed Date: 10/29/2020

Precedential Status: Precedential

Modified Date: 10/29/2020