Home Insurance Co. of New York v. O'Neal ( 1954 )

PER CURIAM.

We- are affirming the judgment in this case for $1,200 for the loss of • a hous.e' because we think there was sufficient evidence to submit the case to the jury on the question .whether there was a “direct, loss by windstorm,” within the meaning of a provision in an insurance policy.

The motion for -an appeal is overruled, and the judgment is affirmed.