Garvin v. Showdy , 8 Ky. Op. 142 ( 1874 )


Menu:
  • Opinion by

    Judge Peters :

    It appears from the bill of exceptions and agreement of the parties that appellee, as administrator of P. G. Rowlete, deceased, had instituted a suit in the Hart Circuit Court against the heirs and creditors of said decedent, to settle the estate as insolvent. Appellant, on his petition filed in that suit, was made a defendant, and presented the same demand against decedent’s estate, upon which this action was brought, and sought judgment therefor. His claim, with others, was referred to the master to hear proof and to be reported on. After hearing the evidence, the master reported adverse to appellant’s claim, and he excepted to so much of the report as rejected his claim. At the May term, 1872, of the Hart Circuit Court, his exceptions were heard by the court and overruled. At the following November term of the court, he procured leave of the court to withdraw his claim for the purpose of prosecuting a suit at law on it against appellee, and the court at the same time so modified the injunction inhibiting the creditors of said intestate from prosecuting several suits for their respective demands, as to permit appellant to sue at law on his demand. These facts appear from the bill of exceptions and the agreement of the parties.

    The first question for consideration is whether the order overruling appellant’s exceptions to the master’s report, and confirming the same, in a final order. The court certainly therein adjudged that appellant has failed to establish his claim, and the litigation between him and appellee as to that ¿matter was terminated; and1 that being the case, the power of the court over that order, being final in its character ceased at the expiration of the term at which it was made, and the permission given by the court to appellant to withdraw his claim and prosecute an action at law on it, could not deprive appellee of the right to rely upon the judgment rendered in the former suit between the same parties for the same cause of action, as a bar, and which as such must be availing.

    Judgment affirmed.

Document Info

Citation Numbers: 8 Ky. Op. 142

Judges: Peters

Filed Date: 10/12/1874

Precedential Status: Precedential

Modified Date: 7/24/2022