State ex rel. Palmer v. State , 2017 La. LEXIS 1032 ( 2017 )

PER CURIAM:

| iDenied. The application was not timely filed in the district court, and relator fails to carry his burden to show that an exception applies. La.C.Cr.P. art. 930.8; State ex rel. Glover v. State, 93-2330 (La. 9/5/95), 660 So.2d 1189. The application is also repetitive. La.C.Cr.P. art. 930.4.

Moreover, relator has previously exhausted his right to state collateral review. See State ex rel. Palmer v. State, 15-1029 (La. 3/4/16), 186 So.3d 1150.