State ex rel. Davis v. State , 220 So. 3d 1292 ( 2017 )


Menu:
  • PER CURIAM:

    |! Denied. The application is repetitive. La.C.Cr.P. art. 930.4. Moreover, relator has previously exhausted his right to state collateral review. See State ex rel. Davis v. State, 16-0227 (La. 6/2/17), 221 So.3d 59, 2017 WL 2436862.

Document Info

Docket Number: No. 2016-KH-0271

Citation Numbers: 220 So. 3d 1292, 2017 WL 2436854

Filed Date: 6/5/2017

Precedential Status: Precedential

Modified Date: 10/19/2024