State v. Armstrong , 1994 La. LEXIS 1477 ( 1994 )

PER CURIAM:

After conducting an independent review of the record and considering the remarks of counsel during oral argument, we conclude that the decision of the Fourth Circuit does not require the exercise of our supervisory-authority. Cf., La.S.Ct. Rule X, § 1(a). Accordingly, we recall our order of February 25, 1994, 632 So.2d 768, as improvidently granted.

KIMBALL, J., not on panel. SHORTESS, J., Judge, First Circuit Court of Appeal, sitting in place of DENNIS, J.