State v. Miss Chub, L.L.C. , 2012 La. App. LEXIS 508 ( 2012 )


Menu:
  • SEXTON, Judge Pro Tem.,

    dissents.

    |J respectfully dissent. The issue is whether the $508,000 was a “clear offer.” Here, the defendant knew the approximate costs at the time of the offer. The final costs after trial were $8,250.14 and, certainly, less at the time of the offer before trial. The defendant was also aware of its fees, which were finally asserted to be $37,725, although the trial court awarded $29,925.

    Therefore, even if you add the total costs, $8,250.14, and the final fees, $37,725, to the jury award of $460,000, the result is $505,975.14. Obviously, this is less than the offer of $508,000.

    Although the offer was very late and certainly inconvenient, I reluctantly believe that it does not trigger the penal provision of La. R.S. 19:8 authorizing attorney fees and would reverse the award of attorney fees.

Document Info

Docket Number: No. 47,054-CA

Citation Numbers: 92 So. 3d 422, 2012 La. App. LEXIS 508, 2012 WL 1192221

Judges: Drew, Gaskins, Sexton, Tempore

Filed Date: 4/11/2012

Precedential Status: Precedential

Modified Date: 10/19/2024