State Of Louisiana v. Joel Smith ( 2022 )


Menu:
  •                                   STATE OF LOUISIANA
    COURT OF APPEAL, FIRST CIRCUIT
    STATE       OF    LOUISIANA                                                                 NO.    2022         KW     0438
    VERSUS
    JOEL     SMITH                                                                                     MAY 171, 2022
    In    Re:          State       of       Louisiana,           applying             for       supervisory                writs,
    19th       Judicial           District          Court,          Parish          of       East        Baton
    Rouge,         No.    DC - 20- 06368.
    BEFORE:            McDONALD,            LANIER,      AND     WOLFE,       JJ.
    WRIT      GRANTED.              Although          evidence          of    other          crimes,            wrongs,
    or    acts       may    not    be       admitted       to    prove       the      accused          is       a   person          of
    criminal           character,             evidence           of    other          crimes           has          long     been
    admissible             if    the    State       establishes             an   independent                and       relevant
    reason       for       its    admission.             See     La.      Code      Evid.        arts.          404( B)(     1) &
    412. 2( A).            See        also        State        v.      Altenberger,                   2013- 2518 (            La.
    4/   11/ 14),       
    139 So. 3d 510
    ,       515 (      per      curiam).                 Furthermore,                  in
    State       v.    Wright,          2011- 141 (       La.     12/ 6/ 11),          
    79 So. 3d 309
    ,         317,      the
    Louisiana          Supreme          Court        pointed          out    that          in    enacting            La.     Code
    Evid.       art.       412. 2, "        the    Legislature            did    not        see    fit to            impose          a
    restriction                 requiring           such        evidence              to        meet        a       stringent
    similarity             requirement             for     admissibility."                        Accordingly,                the
    ruling finding the evidence                                of     the    defendant' s               prior            offense
    inadmissible  is reversed,                             and        this       matter           is     remanded              for
    further          proceedings.
    JMM
    WIL
    EW
    COURT       OF   APPEAL,          FIRST       CIRCUIT
    611S,            0
    DEPUTY CLERK OF COURT
    FOR      THE    COURT
    

Document Info

Docket Number: 2022KW0438

Filed Date: 5/17/2022

Precedential Status: Precedential

Modified Date: 5/17/2022