Cooney v. Rousset ( 1906 )


Menu:
  • ESTOPINAL, J.

    The earnestness with which the application in this case was made impelled us to grant a rehearing, but the reopening and reargument has but served to confirm Us in our opinion. Nothing new was presented in the argument on rehearing, and we therefore adhere to our former decision, and it remains undisturbed.

    Original opinion reported in Vol. 3, page 249.

Document Info

Docket Number: No. 3817

Judges: Estopinal

Filed Date: 12/17/1906

Precedential Status: Precedential

Modified Date: 11/14/2024