-
| iCOOKS, Judge, dissenting.
The August 6th minute entry merely expressed the trial judge’s “intent” to deny the Motion for Reconsideration on presentation
*929 of a judgment containing language to that effect. Concluding otherwise, renders the later judgment unnecessary and meaningless and exposes an unsuspecting competent attorney to a malpractice complaint. I believe such a result is neither mandated by the Code of Procedure nor is it in keeping with the interest of justice.
Document Info
Docket Number: No. 97-1039
Judges: Cooks, Decuir, Hwoodard, Icooks, Woodard
Filed Date: 10/9/1997
Precedential Status: Precedential
Modified Date: 10/18/2024