Lafourche Parish District Attorney, ex rel. Kim Dufrene v. Edward Glen Reinhardt and the Hon. Annette Fontana ( 2022 )


Menu:
  •                                      STATE OF LOUISIANA
    COURT OF APPEAL
    FIRST CIRCUIT
    NUMBER 2022 CE 0812
    LAFOURCHE PARISH DISTRICT ATTORNEY, EX REL. KIM DUFRENE
    VERSUS
    EDWARD GLEN REINHARDT AND THE HON. ANNETTE FONTANA
    Judgment Rendered:    AUG 0 3 2022
    Appealed from the
    Seventeenth Judicial District Court
    In and for the Parish of Lafourche, Louisiana
    Docket Number C- 145319
    Honorable Steven M. Miller, Judge Presiding
    Kristine Russell                           Counsel for Plaintiffs/Appellees,
    District Attorney                          Kim Dufrene through Lafourche
    Parish District Attorney Kristine
    Joseph S. Soignet                          Russell
    Lisa Orgeron
    Assistant District Attorneys
    Thibodaux, LA
    Brent Abadie                               Counsel for Defendant/Appellant,
    Lockport, LA                               Edward Glen Reinhardt
    BEFORE: WHIPPLE, C. J., GUIDRY, CHUTZ, LANIER,
    AND WOLFE, JJ.
    F Afft       r
    T t,Pki# T
    2022 AUG - 3
    AQ!UI
    rr
    LE    ERZ
    WOLFE, J.
    In this suit objecting to the candidacy of Edward Glen Reinhardt for the
    office of Mayor of the Town of Lockport, the district court rendered judgment
    granting the objection and disqualifying Mr. Reinhardt as a candidate for that seat.
    For the following reasons, we reverse.
    FACTS AND PROCEDURAL HISTORY
    Mr. Reinhardt was elected Mayor of the Town of Lockport on November 3,
    2020.   He was sworn into office on January 13, 2021, and began serving a four-
    year term of office on that date.   Approximately ten months later, on November 15,
    2021, Mr. Reinhardt resigned from the office of Mayor of the Town of Lockport.
    As the result of Mr. Reinhardt' s resignation, the Town of Lockport was required to
    call a special election to fill the remainder of his term as mayor, and the special
    election is scheduled to be held on November 8, 2022.
    Following Mr.   Reinhardt' s   resignation,    the   Town   of Lockport,   acting
    through its Council and acting Mayor, passed Ordinance No. 2022- 04 on March
    15, 2022, which enacted Section 2- 213 of the Code of Ordinances for the Town of
    Lockport. As relevant herein, Section 2- 213 provides that an elected town official
    who retires or resigns from office is ineligible to fill the vacancy so created by his
    or her resignation or retirement.
    Thereafter, on July 20, 2022, Mr. Reinhardt qualified as a candidate for the
    office of Mayor of the Town of Lockport,              by filing the required Notice of
    Candidacy form with Lafourche Parish Clerk of Court Annette Fontana. On July
    26,   2022, Kim Dufrene,     through Lafourche Parish District Attorney Kristine
    Russell, filed a petition objecting to Mr. Reinhardt' s qualification as a candidate
    for the Office and asserting that pursuant to Section 2- 213 of the Code of
    Ordinances for the Town of Lockport, Mr. Reinhardt should be disqualified as a
    4
    candidate for the office of Mayor of the Town of Lockport in the special election
    for that office to be held on November 8, 2022. '
    Mr. Reinhardt answered the petition and asserted that Town Ordinance No.
    2022- 04,    enacting Section 2- 213 of the Code of Ordinances for the Town of
    Lockport, was invalid and was unconstitutional as applied to him. Accordingly, he
    averred     that   Ordinance    No.    2022- 04    could   not   serve    as   the   basis   for   his
    disqualification as a candidate for the office of Mayor of the Town of Lockport in
    the November 8, 2022 election.
    A hearing was conducted on July 29, 2022. By judgment signed that same
    day, the district court granted the objection to Mr. Reinhardt' s candidacy and
    disqualified him as a candidate for the office of Mayor of the Town of Lockport.
    From this judgment, Mr. Reinhardt has timely appealed.
    LAW AND ANALYSIS
    A person who meets the qualifications for the office he seeks may become a
    candidate and be voted on in a primary or general election if he qualifies as a
    candidate in the election. Except as otherwise provided by law, a candidate shall
    possess the qualifications for the office he seeks at the time he qualifies for that
    office.    La. R. S. 18: 451.
    The parties in the matter stipulated to the facts set forth above and do not
    dispute that the Town of Lockport does not have a home rule charter and, instead,
    is a " Lawrason Act" municipality. See La. R.S. 33: 321 et seq.                The Lawrason Act
    in La. R.S. 33: 384 sets forth qualifications for a mayor of a municipality, stating
    that "[   t] he mayor shall be an elector of the municipality who at the time of
    qualification as a candidate for the office of mayor shall have been domiciled and
    actually resided for at least the immediately preceding year in the municipality."
    While the petition also set forth a claim for declaratory relief, plaintiffs later withdrew
    the request for such relief.
    3
    Regarding the grounds for objecting to a person' s candidacy,               La. R. S.
    18: 492( A) provides, in pertinent part, as follows:
    An action objecting to the candidacy of a person who qualified
    as a candidate in a primary election shall be based on one or more of
    the following grounds:
    3) The defendant does not meet the qualifications for the office he
    seeks in the primary election.
    4) The defendant is prohibited by law from becoming a candidate for
    one or more of the offices for which he qualified.
    Because election laws must be interpreted to give the electorate the widest
    possible   choice   of candidates,   a person objecting to one' s candidacy bears the
    burden of proving the candidate is disqualified.        Landiak v. Richmond, 2005- 
    0758 La. 3
    / 24/ 05), 
    899 So. 2d 535
    , 541.        Nonetheless, although Louisiana law favors
    candidacy, once the party bearing the burden of proof in an objection to candidacy
    case has established a prima facie case that the candidate is disqualified, the
    burden shifts to the party opposing the disqualification to overcome the other
    party' s prima facie case.      Russo v. Burns, 2014- 1963 ( La. 9/ 24/ 14),    
    147 So. 3d 1111
    ,    1114; Landiak, 899 So. 2d at 542.          If that party is unable to successfully
    rebut the evidence establishing the prima facie case for disqualification,                 the
    objection to the candidacy is to be sustained and the candidate is to be disqualified.
    La. R. S. 18: 494( A); See Russo, 
    147 So. 3d at 1114
    .
    In support of their objection to Mr. Reinhardt' s candidacy, plaintiffs filed
    into    evidence    Ordinance   2022- 04,   enacting    Section   2- 213   of the   Code    of
    Ordinances for the Town of Lockport, which further provides for qualifications or
    eligibility requirements for those seeking office in the Town of Lockport,                  in
    pertinent part, as follows: "      A former elected town official who has retired or
    resigned from office shall be ineligible as a candidate at an election called to fill
    the vacancy created by that retirement or resignation."        The joint stipulations of the
    F41
    parties establish that the Town of Lockport, acting through its duly elected Council
    and acting Mayor, passed Ordinance 2022- 04 on March 15, 2022.
    However, as noted above, the Town of Lockport is a municipality with no
    home rule charter.         Under the 1974 Louisiana Constitution, two forms of local
    government subdivisions are recognized: (            1) home rule charter; and non -home rule
    charter.   American Waste and Pollution Control Co. v. St. Martin Parish Police
    Jam, 
    609 So. 2d 201
    , 202 ( La. 1992). A home rule charter political subdivision is
    afforded much autonomy; it is authorized to exercise any powers " not denied by
    general law or inconsistent with this constitution."           La. Const. art. VI, § 5( E).   In
    stark   contrast,   a non -home rule charter political subdivision is afforded little
    autonomy; its powers are set forth in La. Const. art. VI, § 7( A)        as follows:
    Subject to and not inconsistent with this constitution, the governing
    authority of a local governmental subdivision which has no home rule
    charter or plan of government may exercise any power and perform
    any function necessary, requisite, or proper for the management of its
    affairs, not denied by its charter or by general law, if a majority of
    the electors voting in an election held for that purpose vote in
    favor of the proposition that the governing authority may exercise
    such general powers.         Otherwise, the local governmental subdivision
    shall have the powers authorized by this constitution or by law.
    Emphasis added).          Thus, absent voter approval, a non -home rule charter political
    subdivision,     such as the Town of Lockport, can exercise only those powers
    expressly granted by the constitution or by the legislature.            American Waste and
    Pollution Control Co., 
    609 So. 2d at 202
    .
    Accordingly, given the absence of an express grant of power from the
    legislature empowering non -home rule charter municipalities to adopt additional
    qualifications      for   elected   office,   an ordinance purporting to establish such
    G
    qualifications requires voter approval for the municipality to exercise such power.'
    Applying these precepts herein,           we note     that while the     evidence     and
    stipulations show that the Council and acting Mayor of the Town of Lockport
    passed Ordinance No.         2022- 04 imposing further qualifications for its elected
    officials, the record does not support a finding that the Council and acting Mayor
    so acted with voter approval for the Town to exercise that power.                      See La.
    Const. art. VI, § 7( A).     Accordingly, without a showing that Ordinance 2022- 04
    was passed with approval by a majority of the electors of the Town of Lockport,
    no prima facie case was made to establish that Ordinance 2022- 04 could serve as
    a basis for Mr. Reinhardt' s disqualification.
    Thus,    we   are   constrained to     conclude that the district        court erred in
    disqualifying Mr. Reinhardt as a candidate for the office of Mayor of the Town of
    Lockport for the upcoming November 8, 2022 election.
    CONCLUSION
    For the above and foregoing reasons, the district court' s July 29,                  2022
    judgment declaring Edward Glen Reinhardt ineligible and disqualifying him as a
    candidate for Mayor of the Town of Lockport in the special election to be held on
    November 8, 2022, is reversed in its entirety.            Costs of this appeal are assessed
    against    plaintiffs,   Kim Dufrene through Lafourche Parish District Attorney
    Kristine Russell.
    REVERSED.
    While La. R. S. 18: 451. 1 of the Election Code addresses the manner in which a local
    ordinance affecting the qualifications of a candidate for office becomes effective, the language of
    that particular statute cannot be read to expressly grant authority to a non -home rule charter
    municipality to set such qualifications.
    0
    

Document Info

Docket Number: 2022CE0812

Filed Date: 8/3/2022

Precedential Status: Precedential

Modified Date: 8/3/2022