State Of Louisiana v. Sidney Phillips, Jr. ( 2022 )


Menu:
  • STATE OF LOUISIANA
    COURT OF APPEAL, FIRST CIRCUIT
    STATE OF LOUISIANA NO. 2022 KW 1093
    VERSUS
    SIDNEY FRANK PHILLIPS, J.R. October 11, 2022
    In Re: Sidney Frank Phillips, Jr., applying for supervisory
    writs, 32nd Judicial District Court, Parish of
    Terrebonne, No. 828924.
    BEFORE : McDONALD, McCLENDON, AND HOLDRIDGE, JJ.
    WRIT DENIED.
    JMM
    PMc
    Holdridge, J., dissents and would grant the writ
    application. Only experts are allowed to give opinion testimony
    in areas of specialized knowledge. State v. Morgan, 2012-2060
    (La. App. lst Cir. 6/7/13), 
    119 So.3d 817
    , 827. Under La. Code
    Evid. art. 702, “Tile scientific, technical, or other
    specialized knowledge will assist the trier of fact to
    understand the evidence or to determine a fact in issue, a
    witness qualified as an expert by knowledge, skill, experience,
    training, or education, may testify thereto in the form of an
    opinion or otherwise.” In the instant case, I find that the
    investigating officer should be prohibited from testifying
    regarding historical cell site data as a lay witness until he
    lays a proper foundation establishing 1) he has “knowledge of
    how a cellphone network operates;” 2) he has “experience in
    going through volumes of call detail records;” and 3) he has
    “practical experience in geéeolocating a cell phone that is
    ‘attached’ to a human being.” Without this proper foundation,
    in cases where cell tower mapping is used to establish the
    location of an accused, an expert in historical cell site
    analysis is required to interpret and explain the information
    given by the maps to the jury. See State v. Saltzman, 2013-276
    (La. App. 3d Cir. 10/23/13), 
    128 So.3d 1060
    , writ denied, 2014-
    11 (La. 6/13/14), 
    140 So.3d 1187
    , cert denied, Davis v.
    Louisiana, --- U.S. ---~-, 
    135 S.Ct. 678
    , 
    190 L.Ed.2d 393
     (2014).
    See also United States v. Natal, 
    849 F.3d 530
    , 536 (2d Cir.
    2017) ("testimony on how cell phone towers operate must be
    offered by an expert witness.).
    COURT OF APPEAL, FIRST CIRCUIT
    Or)
    DEPUTY CLERK OF COURT
    FOR THE COURT
    

Document Info

Docket Number: 2022KW1093

Filed Date: 10/11/2022

Precedential Status: Precedential

Modified Date: 10/12/2022