Hall v. Southern Advance Bag & Paper Co. , 164 So. 345 ( 1935 )


Menu:
  • The facts and the pleadings in this case are thoroughly discussed and analyzed in our former opinion. 158 So. 829. No useful purpose would be served by repetition herein. Suffice it to say, that we have again studied this case as though we had not previously done so, and arise from our labor convinced that our original opinion is correct; and for this reason said former decree is now reinstated and made final.

    DREW, J., dissents.

Document Info

Docket Number: No. 4951.

Citation Numbers: 164 So. 345

Judges: Taliaferro, Drew

Filed Date: 12/13/1935

Precedential Status: Precedential

Modified Date: 11/14/2024