Brown & Root Industrial Services, LLC v. Anthony E. Farris, Jr., Kevin D. Steed and Fides Consulting, LLC ( 2022 )


Menu:
  • STATE OF LOUISIANA
    COURT OF APPEAL, FIRST CIRCUIT
    BROWN & ROOT INDUSTRIAL NO. 2022 CW 1162
    SERVICES, LLC
    VERSUS
    ANTHONY E. FARRIS, JR., DECEMBER 1, 2022
    KEVIN D. STEED, AND FIDES
    CONSULTING, LLC
    In Re: Brown & Root Industrial Services, LLC, applying for
    supervisory writs, 19th Judicial District Court,
    Parish of East Baton Rouge, No. 705222.
    BEFORE : WHIPPLE, C.J., GUIDRY AND WOLFE, JJ.
    WRIT GRANTED. The trial court’s September 13, 2022 judgment
    sustaining the exceptions of no cause of action filed by
    defendants, Anthony E. Farris, Jr., Kevin D. Steed, Jaeson M.
    Brown, Jeffrey M. Hebert, Robert A. Huval, Mitchell L. Morgan,
    David E. Sterken, and Fides Consulting, LLC (collectively
    “Defendants”), and dismissing with prejudice Brown & Root
    Industrial Services, LLC’s and BRIS Engineering, LLC’s claims
    for violation of the Louisiana Uniform Trade Secrets Act
    (“LUTSA”), Louisiana Unfair Trade Practices Act (“LUTPA’”), and
    breach of fiduciary duty against Kevin Steed is reversed. A
    partial exception of no cause of action results in an
    impermissible partial judgment. See State, by and through
    Caldwell v. Astra Zeneca AB, 2016-1073 (La. App. Ist Cir.
    4/11/18), 
    249 So.3d 38
    , 43 (en banc), writs denied, 2018-00766,
    2018-0758 (La. 9/21/18), 
    252 So.3d 899
    , 904. If there are two or
    more items of damages or theories of recovery that arise from
    the operative facts of a single transaction or occurrence, a
    partial judgment on an exception of no cause of action should
    not be rendered to dismiss one item of damages or theory of
    recovery. See Everything on Wheels Subaru, Inc. v. Subaru
    South, Inc., 
    616 So.2d 1234
    , 1239 (La. 1993); Expert Riser
    Solutions, LLC v. Techcrane International, LLC, 2018-0612 (La.
    App. lst Cir. 12/28/18), 
    270 So.3d 655
    , 663. Accordingly, the
    writ is granted and the Defendants’ Peremptory Exceptions of No
    Cause of Action as to plaintiffs’ claims under LUTSA, LUTPA, and
    breach of fiduciary duty are denied.
    VGW
    JMG
    EW
    COURT OF APPEAL, FIRST CIRCUIT
    A.D
    DEPUTY CLERK OF COURT
    FOR THE COURT
    

Document Info

Docket Number: 2022CW1162

Filed Date: 12/1/2022

Precedential Status: Precedential

Modified Date: 12/1/2022