Thibodeaux v. City of Sulphur , 1962 La. App. LEXIS 1808 ( 1962 )


Menu:
  • FRUGE, Judge

    (dissenting).

    In the instant case my interpretation of the facts and applicable law is different from that of the majority.

    A person of good moral background who relies on the accepted custom in a community and who bona-fidely takes all necessary steps 'to comply with the existing laws and customs of a community should not be singled out and charged with “technical” violations, — for a municipality to suddenly do so without any prior warning certainly seems to be arbitrary and discriminatory. It is my opinion that the record as a whole clearly shows that the City of Sulphur abused its discretion in revoking the plaintiff’s permit to sell alcoholic beverage.

    For the reasons hereinabove stated, I respectfully dissent.

Document Info

Docket Number: No. 537

Citation Numbers: 140 So. 2d 49, 1962 La. App. LEXIS 1808

Judges: Fruge, Frugé, Hood, Savoy

Filed Date: 4/19/1962

Precedential Status: Precedential

Modified Date: 10/19/2024