State Of Louisiana v. Ruben Van Dyke ( 2023 )


Menu:
  • aA L1101t* COURT OF APPEAL, FIRST CIRCUIT COMZECTED ACTION STATE OF LOUISIANA NO. 2023 KW 0601 VERSUS RUBEN VAN DYKE AUGUST 17, 2023 In Re: Ruben Van Dyke, applying for supervisory writs, 19th Judicial District Court, Parish of East Baton Rouge, No. 05- 13- 0002. BEFORE: McCLENDON, RESTER, AND MILLER, JJ. WRIT DENIED ON THE SHOWING MADE. Relator failed to include a file -stamped copy of the application for postconviction relief, the district court' s ruling, the State' s response, if any, the bill of information, the commitment order, the trial transcript, pertinent district court minutes, and any other portion of the district court record that might support the claims raised in the writ application. Therefore, this court cannot adequately review the ruling at issue herein. Supplementation of this writ application and/ or an application for rehearing will not be considered. See Uniform Rules of Louisiana Courts of Appeal, Rules 2- 18. 7 & 4- 9. In the event relator elects to file a new application with this court, he may do so without the necessity of obtaining a return date. Any future filing on this issue should include the entire contents of this application, the missing items noted above, and a copy of this ruling. COURT OF APPEAL, FIRST CIRCUIT UI EPUTYCLERK OF COURT FOR THE COURT STATE OF LOUISIANA NO. 2023 KW 0601 VERSUS RUBEN VAN DYKE AUGUST 23, 2023 In Re: Ruben Van Dyke, applying for supervisory writs, 19th Judicial District Court, Parish of East Baton Rouge, No. 05- 13- 0002-. BEFORE: McCLENDON, HESTER, AND MILLER, JJ. WRIT DENIED ON THE SHOWING MADE. Relator failed to include a file -stamped copy of the application for postconviction relief, the district court' s ruling, the State' s response, if any, the bill of information, the commitment order, the trial transcript, pertinent district court minutes, and any other portion of the district court record that might support the claims raised in the writ application. Therefore, this court cannot adequately review the ruling at issue herein. Supplementation of this writ application and/ or an application for rehearing will not be considered. See Uniform Rules of Louisiana Courts of Appeal, Rules 2- 18. 7 & 4- 9. In the event relator elects to file a new application with this court, he may do so without the necessity of obtaining a return date. Any future filing on this issue should include the entire contents of this application, the missing items noted above, and a copy of this ruling. PMC CHH SMM

Document Info

Docket Number: 2023KW0601

Filed Date: 8/17/2023

Precedential Status: Precedential

Modified Date: 8/17/2023