-
FULCRUM ENTERPRISES, LLC NO. 23-C-71 VERSUS FIFTH CIRCUIT ST. JOHN THE BAPTIST PARISH COURT OF APPEAL SCHOOL BOARD, ET. AL. STATE OF LOUISIANA February 28, 2023 Linda Wiseman First Deputy Clerk IN RE ST. JOHN THE BAPTIST PARISH SCHOOL BOARD APPLYING FOR SUPERVISORY WRIT FROM THE FORTIETH JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT, PARISH OF ST JOHN THE BAPTIST, STATE OF LOUISIANA, DIRECTED TO THE HONORABLE VERCELL FIFFIE, DIVISION "A", NUMBER C-77965 Panel composed of Judges Susan M. Chehardy, Marc E. Johnson, and Robert A. Chaisson WRIT GRANTED FOR LIMITED PURPOSE Relator, St. John the Baptist Parish School Board, seeks supervisory review of a December 12, 2022 judgment of the trial court granting a Writ of Mandamus filed by plaintiff, Fulcrum Enterprises, LLC (“Fulcrum”), and ordering relator to pay plaintiff $2,457,480.37 plus “reasonable attorney’s fees.” In its writ application, relator indicates that it has also filed a Notice of Suspensive Appeal with the trial court seeking appellate review of this same judgment. The December 12, 2022 judgment appears to award Fulcrum all of the relief requested in its initial Petition for Breach of Contract, including an award of attorney’s fees, although that amount is left indeterminate at this time. 1 Thus, it appears that this judgment purports to resolve all pending claims in this litigation (other than the determination of the specific amount of attorney’s fees awarded), and would constitute a final, appealable judgment in this matter.2 Furthermore, the December 12, 2022 judgment was rendered after a trial on Fulcrum’s Petition for Writ of Mandamus at which evidence was purportedly introduced into the record and considered by the trial court. Neither a transcript of this trial, nor minutes indicating what evidence was admitted and/or if any witnesses were heard, has been attached to this writ application. Without these 1 The amount of the award in the December 12, 2022 judgment is actually $258,169.47 more than the amount requested by Fulcrum in its initial Petition for Breach of Contract. 2 It appears from documents attached to this writ application that the trial court has made this same assessment of the procedural posture of this case. Despite an apparently contradictory Order dated January 18, 2023, which granted relator’s Motion to Extend Return date within which to file an application for supervisory writ, on the same date the trial court issued an Order denying relator’s Notice of Intent to Seek Supervisory Writ, noting that the Notice was “Denied as to supervisory writ. Judgment was final and appealable.” 23-C-71 documents, it is not possible, even if this Court were so inclined, to address the complex issues involved, or review the appropriateness of a substantial monetary judgment against relator, by way of this writ application. Given the procedural posture of this case, we decline to exercise our supervisory jurisdiction to review the judgment in question. Relator’s remedy is to seek review of this judgment by appeal, which, as previously indicated, relator has indicated it is in the process to perfecting, thus affording this Court the benefit of the full record of this matter. However, we do note that an otherwise final judgment that awards attorney’s fees, but does not specify the amount of fees awarded, and is not certified as a final judgment pursuant to La. C.C.P. art. 1915(B), is not a final, appealable judgment. See Ford Motor Credit Co., LLC v. Davis, 20-271 (La. App. 5 Cir. 10/13/21),
329 So.3d 1047, 1051, writ not considered, 21-1739 (La. 1/26/22),
331 So.3d 926; Advanced Leveling & Concrete Sols. v. Lathan Co., Inc., 17-1250 (La. App. 1 Cir. 12/20/18),
268 So.3d 1044, 1046–47. Because the amount of attorney’s fees in the December 12, 2022 judgment is unspecified, the judgment appears to be only partially final. Accordingly, we grant this writ application for the limited purpose of instructing the trial court to either render a judgment on the specified dollar amount of attorney’s fees awarded to Fulcrum, or to make a complete and proper determination pursuant to La. C.C.P. art. 1915(B) that the judgment is final and there is no just reason for delay. In all other respects, this writ application is denied. Gretna, Louisiana, this 28th day of February, 2023. RAC SMC MEJ 2 SUSAN M. CHEHARDY CURTIS B. PURSELL CHIEF JUDGE CLERK OF COURT SUSAN S. BUCHHOLZ FREDERICKA H. WICKER CHIEF DEPUTY CLERK JUDE G. GRAVOIS MARC E. JOHNSON ROBERT A. CHAISSON LINDA M. WISEMAN STEPHEN J. WINDHORST FIRST DEPUTY CLERK HANS J. LILJEBERG JOHN J. MOLAISON, JR. FIFTH CIRCUIT MELISSA C. LEDET JUDGES 101 DERBIGNY STREET (70053) DIRECTOR OF CENTRAL STAFF POST OFFICE BOX 489 GRETNA, LOUISIANA 70054 (504) 376-1400 (504) 376-1498 FAX www.fifthcircuit.org NOTICE OF DISPOSITION CERTIFICATE OF DELIVERY I CERTIFY THAT A COPY OF THE DISPOSITION IN THE FOREGOING MATTER HAS BEEN TRANSMITTED IN ACCORDANCE WITH UNIFORM RULES - COURT OF APPEAL, RULE 4-6 THIS DAY 02/28/2023 TO THE TRIAL JUDGE, THE TRIAL COURT CLERK OF COURT, AND AT LEAST ONE OF THE COUNSEL OF RECORD FOR EACH PARTY, AND TO EACH PARTY NOT REPRESENTED BY COUNSEL, AS LISTED BELOW: 23-C-71 E-NOTIFIED 40th District Court (Clerk) Honorable Vercell Fiffie (DISTRICT JUDGE) Andrew F. Barr (Relator) Charles L. Rice, Jr. (Respondent) MAILED Alejandro R. Perkins (Relator) Evan M. Alvarez (Relator) Attorney at Law 2431 South Acadian Thruway Suite 600 Baton Rouge, LA 70808 SFNDER. cor.~r>LL rL Ui/S SLC i/Of\J • Complete Items 1, 2, and 3. • Print your name and address on the reveree so that we can retum the card to you. • Attach this card to the back of the mallplece, or on the front if space permits. • 1. Artlc1e Addres&ed to: D. Is delivery address dl!ferent from Item 1? If YES, enter delivery address below: Evan M. i\:lvarez Att;omey at Law 2431 South Acadian Thruway Suite 600 Baton Rouge, LA 70808 23-C-71 03-01-23 3. Service 1)tpe 0 ~.Mall Eicpreese I Ill IIllIIIIll IIll 11111111111111111 IllIIII lll 9590 9402 2434 6249 3625 15 O Adult Slgnatura 0 Adult Signalure Restrtcled Dllllvery [l Certified Matte 0 Certified Mell Re8lr1cted ~ [l Reglstelwd Mall"' 0 ~Mall Re9lr1cted Cl Return ReQelpt far O Collect on Oell_,- t,Wchandlse :' A ... ~·~ M .. ~- ~,.,,Imm-""""' IRW 0 Collect on~ Ael1rtcted OellYmy 0 Slgnalln Confirmation... R 0 Signature ConllrmallOl1 7D1b 2010 acao 0954 6731 II Ae8trlcled DelNery Retrk;t8d Oellvery PS Fonn 3811, July 2015 PSN 7530-02-ooo-9053 Domestic Return Receipt
Document Info
Docket Number: 23-C-71
Judges: Vercell Fiffie
Filed Date: 2/28/2023
Precedential Status: Precedential
Modified Date: 10/21/2024