Fulcrum Enterprises, LLC Versus St. John the Baptist Parish School Board ( 2023 )


Menu:
  • FULCRUM ENTERPRISES, LLC                                                            NO. 23-C-71
    VERSUS                                                                              FIFTH CIRCUIT
    ST. JOHN THE BAPTIST PARISH                                                         COURT OF APPEAL
    SCHOOL BOARD, ET. AL.
    STATE OF LOUISIANA
    February 28, 2023
    Linda Wiseman
    First Deputy Clerk
    IN RE ST. JOHN THE BAPTIST PARISH SCHOOL BOARD
    APPLYING FOR SUPERVISORY WRIT FROM THE FORTIETH JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT, PARISH OF
    ST JOHN THE BAPTIST, STATE OF LOUISIANA, DIRECTED TO THE HONORABLE VERCELL FIFFIE,
    DIVISION "A", NUMBER C-77965
    Panel composed of Judges Susan M. Chehardy,
    Marc E. Johnson, and Robert A. Chaisson
    WRIT GRANTED FOR LIMITED PURPOSE
    Relator, St. John the Baptist Parish School Board, seeks supervisory review
    of a December 12, 2022 judgment of the trial court granting a Writ of Mandamus
    filed by plaintiff, Fulcrum Enterprises, LLC (“Fulcrum”), and ordering relator to
    pay plaintiff $2,457,480.37 plus “reasonable attorney’s fees.” In its writ
    application, relator indicates that it has also filed a Notice of Suspensive Appeal
    with the trial court seeking appellate review of this same judgment.
    The December 12, 2022 judgment appears to award Fulcrum all of the relief
    requested in its initial Petition for Breach of Contract, including an award of
    attorney’s fees, although that amount is left indeterminate at this time. 1 Thus, it
    appears that this judgment purports to resolve all pending claims in this litigation
    (other than the determination of the specific amount of attorney’s fees awarded),
    and would constitute a final, appealable judgment in this matter.2
    Furthermore, the December 12, 2022 judgment was rendered after a trial on
    Fulcrum’s Petition for Writ of Mandamus at which evidence was purportedly
    introduced into the record and considered by the trial court. Neither a transcript of
    this trial, nor minutes indicating what evidence was admitted and/or if any
    witnesses were heard, has been attached to this writ application. Without these
    1
    The amount of the award in the December 12, 2022 judgment is actually $258,169.47 more than the amount
    requested by Fulcrum in its initial Petition for Breach of Contract.
    2
    It appears from documents attached to this writ application that the trial court has made this same assessment of the
    procedural posture of this case. Despite an apparently contradictory Order dated January 18, 2023, which granted
    relator’s Motion to Extend Return date within which to file an application for supervisory writ, on the same date the
    trial court issued an Order denying relator’s Notice of Intent to Seek Supervisory Writ, noting that the Notice was
    “Denied as to supervisory writ. Judgment was final and appealable.”
    23-C-71
    documents, it is not possible, even if this Court were so inclined, to address the
    complex issues involved, or review the appropriateness of a substantial monetary
    judgment against relator, by way of this writ application.
    Given the procedural posture of this case, we decline to exercise our
    supervisory jurisdiction to review the judgment in question. Relator’s remedy is to
    seek review of this judgment by appeal, which, as previously indicated, relator has
    indicated it is in the process to perfecting, thus affording this Court the benefit of
    the full record of this matter.
    However, we do note that an otherwise final judgment that awards attorney’s
    fees, but does not specify the amount of fees awarded, and is not certified as a final
    judgment pursuant to La. C.C.P. art. 1915(B), is not a final, appealable judgment.
    See Ford Motor Credit Co., LLC v. Davis, 20-271 (La. App. 5 Cir. 10/13/21), 
    329 So.3d 1047
    , 1051, writ not considered, 21-1739 (La. 1/26/22), 
    331 So.3d 926
    ;
    Advanced Leveling & Concrete Sols. v. Lathan Co., Inc., 17-1250 (La. App. 1 Cir.
    12/20/18), 
    268 So.3d 1044
    , 1046–47. Because the amount of attorney’s fees in the
    December 12, 2022 judgment is unspecified, the judgment appears to be only
    partially final.
    Accordingly, we grant this writ application for the limited purpose of
    instructing the trial court to either render a judgment on the specified dollar amount
    of attorney’s fees awarded to Fulcrum, or to make a complete and proper
    determination pursuant to La. C.C.P. art. 1915(B) that the judgment is final and
    there is no just reason for delay. In all other respects, this writ application is
    denied.
    Gretna, Louisiana, this 28th day of February, 2023.
    RAC
    SMC
    MEJ
    2
    SUSAN M. CHEHARDY                                                               CURTIS B. PURSELL
    CHIEF JUDGE                                                                     CLERK OF COURT
    SUSAN S. BUCHHOLZ
    FREDERICKA H. WICKER
    CHIEF DEPUTY CLERK
    JUDE G. GRAVOIS
    MARC E. JOHNSON
    ROBERT A. CHAISSON                                                              LINDA M. WISEMAN
    STEPHEN J. WINDHORST
    FIRST DEPUTY CLERK
    HANS J. LILJEBERG
    JOHN J. MOLAISON, JR.                           FIFTH CIRCUIT
    MELISSA C. LEDET
    JUDGES                                    101 DERBIGNY STREET (70053)
    DIRECTOR OF CENTRAL STAFF
    POST OFFICE BOX 489
    GRETNA, LOUISIANA 70054              (504) 376-1400
    (504) 376-1498 FAX
    www.fifthcircuit.org
    NOTICE OF DISPOSITION CERTIFICATE OF DELIVERY
    I CERTIFY THAT A COPY OF THE DISPOSITION IN THE FOREGOING MATTER HAS BEEN
    TRANSMITTED IN ACCORDANCE WITH UNIFORM RULES - COURT OF APPEAL, RULE 4-6 THIS
    DAY 02/28/2023 TO THE TRIAL JUDGE, THE TRIAL COURT CLERK OF COURT, AND AT LEAST ONE OF
    THE COUNSEL OF RECORD FOR EACH PARTY, AND TO EACH PARTY NOT REPRESENTED BY
    COUNSEL, AS LISTED BELOW:
    23-C-71
    E-NOTIFIED
    40th District Court (Clerk)
    Honorable Vercell Fiffie (DISTRICT JUDGE)
    Andrew F. Barr (Relator)
    Charles L. Rice, Jr. (Respondent)
    MAILED
    Alejandro R. Perkins (Relator)
    Evan M. Alvarez (Relator)
    Attorney at Law
    2431 South Acadian Thruway
    Suite 600
    Baton Rouge, LA 70808
    SFNDER. cor.~r>LL rL Ui/S SLC i/Of\J
    • Complete Items 1, 2, and 3.
    • Print your name and address on the reveree
    so that we can retum the card to you.
    • Attach this card to the back of the mallplece,
    or on the front if space permits.          •
    1. Artlc1e Addres&ed to:                                   D. Is delivery address dl!ferent from Item 1?
    If YES, enter delivery address below:
    Evan M. i\:lvarez
    Att;omey at Law
    2431 South Acadian Thruway
    Suite 600
    Baton Rouge, LA 70808
    23-C-71                 03-01-23
    3. Service 1)tpe                          0 ~.Mall Eicpreese
    I Ill IIllIIIIll IIll
    11111111111111111 IllIIII lll
    9590 9402 2434 6249 3625 15
    O Adult Slgnatura
    0 Adult Signalure Restrtcled Dllllvery
    [l Certified Matte
    0 Certified Mell Re8lr1cted ~
    [l Reglstelwd Mall"'
    0 ~Mall Re9lr1cted
    Cl Return ReQelpt far
    O Collect on Oell_,-                         t,Wchandlse
    :'    A ... ~·~ M .. ~- ~,.,,Imm-""""' IRW
    0 Collect on~ Ael1rtcted OellYmy 0 Slgnalln Confirmation...
    R                     0 Signature ConllrmallOl1
    7D1b 2010 acao 0954 6731                                  II Ae8trlcled DelNery   Retrk;t8d Oellvery
    PS Fonn 3811, July 2015 PSN 7530-02-ooo-9053                                                      Domestic Return Receipt
    

Document Info

Docket Number: 23-C-71

Judges: Vercell Fiffie

Filed Date: 2/28/2023

Precedential Status: Precedential

Modified Date: 10/21/2024