State of Louisiana Versus Walter Sippio ( 2023 )


Menu:
  • STATE OF LOUISIANA                                               NO. 23-K-426
    VERSUS                                                           FIFTH CIRCUIT
    WALTER SIPPIO                                                    COURT OF APPEAL
    STATE OF LOUISIANA
    September 01, 2023
    Linda Wiseman
    First Deputy Clerk
    IN RE WALTER SIPPIO
    APPLYING FOR SUPERVISORY WRIT FROM THE TWENTY-FOURTH JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT,
    PARISH OF JEFFERSON, STATE OF LOUISIANA, DIRECTED TO THE HONORABLE DONALD L. FORET,
    DIVISION "H", NUMBER 21-5042
    Panel composed of Judges Jude G. Gravois,
    Stephen J. Windhorst, and John J. Molaison, Jr.
    WRIT GRANTED; RULING ON MOTION TO WITHDRAW
    REVERSED; MOTION TO WITHDRAW GRANTED
    Relator, Walter Sippio, seeks this Court’s supervisory review of the trial
    court’s August 24, 2023 ruling which denied his counsel’s Motion to Withdraw.
    Trial on the merits of this matter is set for September 11, 2023.
    The State filed a “Response” to the writ application, asserting therein that
    defense counsel should be allowed to withdraw. For the following reasons, we
    find that the trial court abused its discretion in denying the Motion to Withdraw.
    We accordingly reverse the trial court’s ruling on the Motion to Withdraw and
    grant the Motion to Withdraw.
    Eusi Phillips, counsel for defendant, represented defendant in his first trial,
    which ended in a mistrial due to a hung jury on May 10, 2023. In August of 2023,
    Mr. Phillips accepted a position with the St. John the Baptist Parish District
    Attorney’s Office, beginning on September 1, 2023. Mr. Phillips informed the trial
    court of such on August 23, 2023, and filed a Motion to Withdraw on August 24,
    2023, which the trial judge denied, citing the September 11, 2023 trial date. Mr.
    Phillips requested a stay of the trial, which was also denied.
    Article V, § 26 (C) of the Louisiana Constitution provides that “no district
    attorney or assistant district attorney shall appear, plead, or in any way defend or
    assist in defending any criminal prosecution or charge. A violation of this
    Paragraph shall be cause for removal.” Rule of Professional Conduct l.l6(a)
    requires that a lawyer timely withdraw from representation when continuing the
    representation would violate the Rules of Professional Conduct or other law. La.
    C.Cr.P. art. 65 provides in pertinent part that “[i]t is unlawful for the following
    officers or their law partners to defend or assist in the defense of any person
    charged with an offense in any parish of the state: ... [a]ny district attorney or
    assistant district attorney.”
    The State points out in its Response that while it does not impugn defense
    counsel’s integrity or adherence to the Rules of Professional Conduct, his
    continuing to represent defendant in the instant case could create the appearance of
    impropriety and cast an unnecessary specter over this case. The State argues that if
    defendant is convicted at trial, he could urge in a post-conviction relief application
    that defense counsel had a conflict of interest given his pending employment as an
    assistant district attorney, or that defense counsel “threw the case” given that
    defense counsel immediately thereafter commenced work as an assistant district
    attorney. It further argues that while those allegations would be meritless, they
    represent an unnecessary and easily avoidable issue.
    In State v. Bridgewater, 00-1529 (La. 1/15/02), 
    823 So.2d 877
    , 887, cert.
    denied, 
    537 U.S. 1227
    , 
    123 S.Ct. 1266
    , 
    154 L.Ed.2d 1089
     (2003), the history of the
    case showed that a defense attorney’s motion to withdraw was granted after he
    accepted a job with the Jefferson Parish District Attorney’s Office.
    The grant or denial of a motion to withdraw as counsel is within the “well
    founded” discretion of the trial court. State v. Stewart, 
    493 So.2d 227
    , 232 (La.
    App. 5 Cir. 1986) (citing State v. Franks, 
    284 So.2d 584
     (La. 1973)).
    Considering that there has been one previous mistrial in this matter, the
    integrity of the proceeding against relator must be protected, even at the risk of
    trial not going forward on September 11, 2023. Under the circumstances
    presented, we find that it was an abuse of the trial court’s discretion to deny Mr.
    Phillips’s Motion to Withdraw. Defense counsel has accepted a position as an
    assistant district attorney in St. John the Baptist Parish with a start date of
    September 1, 2023. This position would legally bar defense counsel from
    performing criminal defense work, which would include representing defendant in
    the instant case after September 1, 2023. See La. Const. Ann. art. V, § 26; La.
    C.Cr.P. art. 65. Also, defense counsel should be allowed to withdraw to avoid the
    suggestion of impropriety which could arise. See Official Revision Comment (a)
    to La. C.Cr.P. art. 65. Further, the State agrees that defense counsel should be
    allowed to withdraw. Under these particular circumstances, we find that the trial
    court abused its discretion in denying defense counsel’s Motion to Withdraw.
    Accordingly, the writ application is granted; the trial court’s ruling on the Motion
    to Withdraw is reversed; and the Motion to Withdraw is granted.
    Gretna, Louisiana, this 1st day of September, 2023.
    JGG
    SJW
    JJM
    SUSAN M. CHEHARDY                                                               CURTIS B. PURSELL
    CHIEF JUDGE                                                                     CLERK OF COURT
    SUSAN S. BUCHHOLZ
    FREDERICKA H. WICKER
    CHIEF DEPUTY CLERK
    JUDE G. GRAVOIS
    MARC E. JOHNSON
    ROBERT A. CHAISSON                                                              LINDA M. WISEMAN
    STEPHEN J. WINDHORST
    FIRST DEPUTY CLERK
    JOHN J. MOLAISON, JR.
    SCOTT U. SCHLEGEL                                      FIFTH CIRCUIT
    MELISSA C. LEDET
    JUDGES                                       101 DERBIGNY STREET (70053)
    DIRECTOR OF CENTRAL STAFF
    POST OFFICE BOX 489
    GRETNA, LOUISIANA 70054          (504) 376-1400
    (504) 376-1498 FAX
    www.fifthcircuit.org
    NOTICE OF DISPOSITION CERTIFICATE OF DELIVERY
    I CERTIFY THAT A COPY OF THE DISPOSITION IN THE FOREGOING MATTER HAS BEEN
    TRANSMITTED IN ACCORDANCE WITH UNIFORM RULES - COURT OF APPEAL, RULE 4-6 THIS
    DAY 09/01/2023 TO THE TRIAL JUDGE, THE TRIAL COURT CLERK OF COURT, AND AT LEAST ONE OF
    THE COUNSEL OF RECORD FOR EACH PARTY, AND TO EACH PARTY NOT REPRESENTED BY
    COUNSEL, AS LISTED BELOW:
    23-K-426
    E-NOTIFIED
    24th Judicial District Court (Clerk)
    Honorable Donald L. Foret (DISTRICT JUDGE)
    Thomas J. Butler (Respondent)                Eusi H. Phillips (Relator)
    Darren A. Allemand (Respondent)
    MAILED
    Honorable Paul D. Connick, Jr.
    (Respondent)
    District Attorney
    Twenty-Fourth Judicial District
    200 Derbigny Street
    Gretna, LA 70053
    

Document Info

Docket Number: 23-K-426

Judges: Donald L. Foret

Filed Date: 9/1/2023

Precedential Status: Precedential

Modified Date: 10/21/2024