State of Louisiana Versus Michael Anthony Short ( 2023 )


Menu:
  • STATE OF LOUISIANA                                    NO. 22-KA-263
    VERSUS                                                FIFTH CIRCUIT
    MICHAEL ANTHONY SHORT                                 COURT OF APPEAL
    STATE OF LOUISIANA
    ON APPEAL FROM THE TWENTY-FOURTH JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT
    PARISH OF JEFFERSON, STATE OF LOUISIANA
    NO. 19-6094, DIVISION "E"
    HONORABLE FRANK A. BRINDISI, JUDGE PRESIDING
    February 27, 2023
    SUSAN M. CHEHARDY
    CHIEF JUDGE
    Panel composed of Judges Susan M. Chehardy,
    Fredericka Homberg Wicker, and Hans J. Liljeberg
    SENTENCE VACATED,
    CASE REMANDED
    SMC
    FHW
    HJL
    COUNSEL FOR PLAINTIFF/APPELLEE,
    STATE OF LOUISIANA
    Honorable Paul D. Connick, Jr.
    Thomas J. Butler
    Monique D. Nolan
    Gabrielle Hosli
    Kristen Landrieu
    COUNSEL FOR DEFENDANT/APPELLANT,
    MICHAEL ANTHONY SHORT
    Bertha M. Hillman
    CHEHARDY, C.J.
    On February 14, 2020, the Jefferson Parish District Attorney filed a bill of
    information charging defendant, Michael Anthony Short, with one count of
    introducing or possessing contraband in the form of a makeshift weapon into the
    Jefferson Parish Correctional Center, a violation of La. R.S. 14:402. Defendant
    pled not guilty. On April 21, 2022, a six-person jury unanimously found defendant
    guilty as charged.
    On April 27, 2022, before sentencing, defendant filed a Motion for New
    Trial and a Motion for Post-Verdict Judgment of Acquittal. At the sentencing
    hearing later the same day, the trial court sentenced defendant to ten years in the
    Department of Corrections.1 Immediately after sentencing, the trial court denied
    defendant’s motion for new trial and motion for post-verdict judgment of
    acquittal.2 Defendant objected, and on May 2, 2022, he filed a Motion for
    Reconsideration of Sentence and a Motion for Appeal. On May 4, 2022, the trial
    court denied defendant’s motion for reconsideration and granted his motion for
    appeal.3
    Defendant’s sole assignment of error on appeal is that his sentence is
    constitutionally excessive.
    1
    This Court has previously held that when the trial judge states that the defendant is sentenced to
    the “Department of Corrections,” the sentence is necessarily at hard labor. State v. Jamison, 17-
    49 (La. App. 5 Cir. 5/17/17), 
    222 So.3d 908
    , 909 n.2.
    2
    The trial court signed the orders denying both motions on May 2, 2022.
    3
    It is not clear from the record whether the trial court denied defendant’s motion for
    reconsideration of sentence before or after ruling on defendant’s motion for appeal. Regardless
    of the order of the trial court’s rulings, the court maintained jurisdiction to rule on the timely
    filed motion to reconsider sentence under La. C.Cr.P. art. 916(3), which provides in pertinent
    part:
    The jurisdiction of the trial court is divested and that of the appellate court attaches
    upon the entering of the order of appeal. Thereafter, the trial court has no
    jurisdiction to take any action except as otherwise provided by law and to:
    ***
    (3) Correct an illegal sentence or take other appropriate action pursuant to a
    properly made or filed motion to reconsider sentence.
    22-KA-263                                           1
    Our review of the record reveals errors patent in conjunction with
    defendant’s timely filed motion for new trial and motion for post-verdict judgment
    of acquittal, because the trial court denied these motions after imposing
    defendant’s sentence on April 27, 2022.
    La. C.Cr.P. art. 821(A) requires that a motion for post-verdict judgment of
    acquittal be made and disposed of before sentencing. State v. Christian, 05-635
    (La. App. 5 Cir. 2/3/06), 
    924 So.2d 266
    , 267. Similarly, La. C.Cr.P. art. 853(A)
    provides that a motion for new trial generally must be filed and disposed of before
    sentencing. State v. Barnes, 11-80 (La. App. 5 Cir. 12/13/11), 
    92 So.3d 9
    , 12, writ
    denied, 12-951 (La. 11/9/12), 
    100 So.3d 828
    . See also State v. Aguliar-Benitez, 16-
    336 (La. App. 5 Cir. 12/7/16), 
    206 So.3d 472
    , 473 (vacating the trial court’s denial
    of the defendant’s motion for new trial, which was denied after his sentence was
    imposed); State v. Common, 10-996 (La. App. 5 Cir. 11/15/11), 
    78 So.3d 237
    , 245,
    writ denied, 11-2779 (La. 9/28/12), 
    98 So.3d 825
     (vacating an enhanced sentence,
    remanding for a hearing on the motions for post-verdict judgment of acquittal and
    new trial, and for resentencing).
    Given the trial court’s procedural error, we pretermit discussion of
    defendant’s assignment of error regarding the constitutionality of his sentence. We
    vacate defendant’s sentence, vacate the trial court’s rulings on defendant’s
    motions, and remand for the trial court to rule on defendant’s motion for post-
    verdict judgment of acquittal, his motion for new trial, and for resentencing.4
    Defendant’s right to appeal any adverse ruling on his motions, or his new sentence,
    is preserved.
    SENTENCE VACATED,
    CASE REMANDED
    4
    At the time of sentencing, the trial court also failed to advise defendant of his right to post-
    conviction relief pursuant to La. C.Cr.P. art. 930.8. The trial court may properly advise
    defendant if he is resentenced.
    22-KA-263                                         2
    SUSAN M. CHEHARDY                                                              CURTIS B. PURSELL
    CHIEF JUDGE                                                                    CLERK OF COURT
    SUSAN S. BUCHHOLZ
    FREDERICKA H. WICKER
    CHIEF DEPUTY CLERK
    JUDE G. GRAVOIS
    MARC E. JOHNSON
    ROBERT A. CHAISSON                                                             LINDA M. WISEMAN
    STEPHEN J. WINDHORST
    FIRST DEPUTY CLERK
    HANS J. LILJEBERG
    JOHN J. MOLAISON, JR.                          FIFTH CIRCUIT
    MELISSA C. LEDET
    JUDGES                                 101 DERBIGNY STREET (70053)
    DIRECTOR OF CENTRAL STAFF
    POST OFFICE BOX 489
    GRETNA, LOUISIANA 70054               (504) 376-1400
    (504) 376-1498 FAX
    www.fifthcircuit.org
    NOTICE OF JUDGMENT AND CERTIFICATE OF DELIVERY
    I CERTIFY THAT A COPY OF THE OPINION IN THE BELOW-NUMBERED MATTER HAS BEEN DELIVERED
    IN ACCORDANCE WITH UNIFORM RULES - COURT OF APPEAL, RULE 2-16.4 AND 2-16.5 THIS DAY
    FEBRUARY 27, 2023 TO THE TRIAL JUDGE, CLERK OF COURT, COUNSEL OF RECORD AND ALL PARTIES
    NOT REPRESENTED BY COUNSEL, AS LISTED BELOW:
    22-KA-263
    E-NOTIFIED
    24TH JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT (CLERK)
    HONORABLE FRANK A. BRINDISI (DISTRICT JUDGE)
    MONIQUE D. NOLAN (APPELLEE)             THOMAS J. BUTLER (APPELLEE)    BERTHA M. HILLMAN (APPELLANT)
    MAILED
    HONORABLE PAUL D. CONNICK, JR.
    (APPELLEE)
    DISTRICT ATTORNEY
    GABRIELLE HOSLI (APPELLEE)
    KRISTEN LANDRIEU (APPELLEE)
    ASSISTANT DISTRICT ATTORNEYS
    TWENTY-FOURTH JUDICIAL DISTRICT
    200 DERBIGNY STREET
    GRETNA, LA 70053
    

Document Info

Docket Number: 22-KA-263

Judges: Frank A. Brindisi

Filed Date: 2/27/2023

Precedential Status: Precedential

Modified Date: 10/21/2024