Crosstex Energy Services, LP, Crosstex LIG, LLC and Crosstex Processing Services, LLC v. Texas Brine Company, LLC ( 2019 )


Menu:
  •                         NOT DESIGNATED FOR PUBLICATION
    STATE OF LOUISIANA
    COURT OF APPEAL
    FIRST CIRCUIT
    2018 CA 0900
    CROSSTEX ENERGY SERVICES, LP, CROSSTEX LICy LLC AND
    CROSSTEX PROCESSING SERVICES, LLC
    VERSUS
    TEXAS BRINE COMPANY, LLC, ET AL.
    I
    Judgment Rendered:   AUG a 5 2019'
    APPEALED FROM THE TWENTY-THIRD JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT
    L                          IN AND FOR THE PARISH OF ASSUMPTION
    STATE OF LOUISIANA
    DOCKET NUMBER 34202
    HONORABLE THOMAS J. KLIEBERT, JR., JUDGE
    Leopold Z. Sher                               Attorneys for Appellant/Defendant/
    James M. Garner                               Third -Party Plaintiff
    Peter L. Hilbert, Jr.                         Texas Brine Company, LLC
    Jeffrey D. Kessler
    New Orleans, Louisiana
    Travis J. Turner
    Gonzales, Louisiana
    Eric J. Mayer
    Houston, Texas
    Robert Ryland Percy, III
    Gonzales, Louisiana
    Matthew J. Randazzo, III                      Attorneys for Appellee/
    Christopher B. Bailey                         Third -Party Defendant
    Will Montz                                    Browning Oil Company, Inc.
    Lafayette, Louisiana
    BEFORE:       McDONALD, CRAIN, and PENZATO, JJ.
    McDONALD, J.
    This appeal relates to one of several lawsuits arising from the August 3,
    2012 sinkhole that developed near Bayou Come in Assumption Parish, Louisiana.
    In this appeal, Texas Brine Company, LLC, defendant and third -party plaintiff,
    appeals an October 31,       2017 district court judgment dismissing all of its claims
    with prejudice against Browning Oil Company, Inc., a third -party defendant in this
    litigation, on a motion for involuntary dismissal.         Texas Brine also challenges the
    pre-trial summary judgment that dismissed Texas Brine' s claims against Browning
    Oil Company under pre -1996 law.
    This court recently held in Pontchartrain Natural Gas System v. Texas
    Brine Company, LLC, 2018- 0606 ( La. App. 1 Cir. 12/ 21/ 18), 
    268 So. 3d 1058
    ,
    1063, writ denied, 2019- 0526 ( La. 6/ 7/ 19), _          So. 3d_,   that since all of Texas
    Brine' s property and equipment was allegedly damaged after the                         sinkhole
    occurred, and the remaining third -party tort claims for litigation expenses, lost
    profits,    and environmental -response costs certainly occurred after the sinkhole
    emerged in August 2012, the substantive law in effect at that time applies. In that
    case,
    this court found that the district court did not err in granting summary
    judgment       in   favor   of   the   non -operators (   Reliance    Corporation,      LORCA
    Corporation, Colorado Crude Company, and Sol Kirschner), and dismissing all of
    Texas Brine' s third -party tort claims, including indemnity and contribution, against
    each    of    the    non -operators,    and    affirmed    the    district   court    judgment.
    Pontchartrain, 268 So. 3d at 1064.
    Thereafter,    in   Pontchartrain      Natural     Gas    System     v.    Texas   Brine
    Company, LLC, 2018- 0631 ( La. App. 1 Cir. 7/ 3/ 19), 
    2019 WL 2865136
    , * 5, _
    So. 3d _,     this court found that the district court' s October 31, 2017 judgment,
    granting     Browning Oil        Company' s    motion     for    involuntary      dismissal   and
    dismissing all of Texas Brine' s claims against it with prejudice, was reasonable and
    2
    not clearly wrong, and this court affirmed the district court judgment. Further, this
    court found that upholding the district court' s grant of Browning Oil Company' s
    motion for involuntary dismissal negated any need for further discussion or
    analysis of Texas Brine' s pre -1996 claims against Browning Oil Company.
    Pontchartrain Natural Gas System, 
    2019 WL 2865136
     at * 6,            So. 3d at
    The judgment in this case is based on the same evidence considered in
    Pontchartrain Natural Gas System, 2018- 0631, and we affirm the October 31,
    2017 district court judgment involuntarily dismissing all of Texas Brine' s claims
    against Browning Oil Company with prejudice for the reasons stated therein.
    Texas Brine' s September 24, 2018 motion to supplement the record with exhibits is
    granted,    and this court' s clerk of court is hereby instructed to supplement the
    record with the exhibits referenced in and attached to the motion.    This summary
    opinion is issued in accordance with Uniform Rules -Courts of Appeal, Rule 2-
    16. 2A(2)    and (   8).   All costs of this appeal are assessed against Texas Brine
    Company, LLC.
    AFFIRMED;             TEXAS     BRINE' S    MOTION      TO    SUPPLEMENT
    RECORD GRANTED.
    3
    

Document Info

Docket Number: 2018CA0900

Filed Date: 8/5/2019

Precedential Status: Precedential

Modified Date: 10/22/2024