Douglas Robins v. Mohammad Zohair Pirzadah, M.D. ( 2021 )


Menu:
  •                                       STATE OF LOUISIANA
    COURT OF APPEAL, FIRST CIRCUIT
    DOUGLAS          ROBINS,            ET     AL                                                                   NO.        2021      CW       1274
    VERSUS                                                                                                                     PAGE      1    OF    2
    MOHAMMAD            ZOHAIR          PIRZADAH,                M. D.,
    ET    AL
    CONSOLIDATED                    WITH
    DOUGLAS          ROBINS         AND          KATHERINE
    ROBINS
    VERSUS
    DECEMBER               20 ,    2021
    MOHAMMAD            ZOHAIR          PIRZADAH,                M. D.,
    AND      CHARLES          LANE        PEARSON,                   JR.,
    M. D.
    In    Re:             Douglas                Robins               and        Katherine                Robins,           applying               for
    supervisory                       writs,               19th            Judicial            District                Court,
    Parish       of      East          Baton           Rouge,       Nos.         642149          c/ w   698066.
    BEFORE:               McCLENDON,                WELCH,                AND    THERIOT,               JJ.
    WRIT          GRANTED.             The            trial           court'       s     August           26,         2021        ruling
    which         disqualified                      John             L.         Hammons           from         serving           as      counsel
    herein         is        reversed.         The burden of proving disqualification of an
    attorney or other                        officer of the court rests on the party making
    the      challenge.              Succession                      of     Armand,          2019- 751 (            La.     App.        3rd       Cir.
    2/ 27/ 20),              
    297 So. 3d 37
    ,            40,        citing       Walker            v.    State,            Dept         of
    Transp.          and          Development,                   2001- 2078,                2001- 2079 (            La.     5/ 14/ 02),            
    817 So. 2d 57
    ,        60.     When         a        party            raises          an     exception              or     motion           that
    must        be      proven,           it
    party' s     is            that                         burden            to    present            evidence
    establishing  the   claims  made  therein.   Landis  Construction                                                                             Co.,
    LLC  v.   State   of   Louisiana,   2015- 1167 ( La.   App.  1st                                                                              Cir.
    2/ 29/ 16),              
    199 So. 3d 1
    ,        2.         Here,       although               the    parties            attached
    documents                to    their         motions,                   these      documents               were        never        formally
    introduced.                   Evidence                 not
    properly  and                               officially offered  and
    introduced                cannot         be       considered, even if                               it is physically placed
    in      the      record.         Denoux                v.    Vessel            Management                 Services,          Inc.,        2007-
    2143 (        La.         5/ 21/ 08),                  
    983 So. 2d 84
    ,         88.     Appellate               courts           are
    courts           of      record       and         may        not         review         evidence            that        is    not        in    the
    appellate                 record,             or            receive            new        evidence.              
    Id.
             Defendants,
    Mohammad              Zohair          Pirzadah,                    M. D.       and       Charles            Lane        Pearson,              Jr.,
    M. D.,        failed           to     meet             their            burden          of     proof,           and     therefore,               we
    find the trial court erred in granting the motion.                                                                      The       motion         to
    disqualify counsel is denied.
    PMC
    JEW
    Theriot,             J.,          concurs.                   A    lawyer            is         not    likely            to     be         a
    necessary                witness             when           evidence              pertaining                to    each            matter         to
    which he                 could        testify                is         available             from         another           source.           See
    Horaist             v.     Doctor' s              Hospital                  of     Opelousas,               
    255 F. 3d 261
    ,        267
    5th        Cir.         2001).          I      find             that        based       on         the    documents              presented
    and        arguments             asserted,                       defendants,                 Mohammad            Zohair           Pirzadah,
    M. D.       and          Charles             Lane            Pearson,              Jr.,         M. D.,          will         be     able         to
    STATE OF LOUISIANA
    COURT OF APPEAL, FIRST CIRCUIT
    NO.       2021    CW   1274
    PAGE    2   OF    2
    support      their    defense       against  this nullity action         using       sources
    other     than      Mr.      Hammons'     testimony. Therefore,          I     concur          in
    granting   the  writ              and reversing  the    trial   court'   s    August       25,
    2021  ruling   which             disqualified John L.    Hammons    from      serving          as
    counsel.
    COURT   OF   APPEAL,        FIRST    CIRCUIT
    DEPUTY         CLERK    OF    COURT
    FOR    THE    COURT
    

Document Info

Docket Number: 2021CW1274

Filed Date: 12/20/2021

Precedential Status: Precedential

Modified Date: 10/22/2024