Covenant General Contractors, Inc. v. S.J. Louis Construction of Texas Ltd. and City of Baton Rouge, East Baton Rouge Parish and Liberty Mutual Insurance Company ( 2020 )


Menu:
  •                                    STATE OF LOUISIANA
    COURT OF APPEAL, FIRST CIRCUIT
    COVENANT           GENERAL            CONTRACTORS,                INC.                                   NO.          2020          CW    0939
    VERSUS
    S. J.       LOUIS       CONSTRUCTION                  OF    TEXAS,
    LTD.        AND    CITY        OF     BATON       ROUGE,          EAST
    DECEMBER $,                     2020
    BATON        ROUGE        PARISH          AND     LIBERTY
    MUTUAL          INSURANCE             COMPANY
    In    Re:              S. J.       Louis         Construction                 of        Texas,            Ltd.            and        Liberty
    Mutual             Insurance              Company,            applying                  for           supervisory
    writs,           19th      Judicial              District             Court,              Parish              of        East
    Baton        Rouge,        No.        682787.
    BEFORE:             McDONALD,               HOLDRIDGE,                AND    PENZATO,              JJ.
    WRIT        GRANTED.                 The         trial          court'      s        judgment                 denying               the
    defendants',                  S. J.       Louis        Construction                of       Texas,             Ltd.        and       Liberty
    Mutual          Insurance               Company' s,              exception           of       prematurity                    and          motion
    to  stay    pending                             arbitration                  is         reversed.                         S. J.            Louis
    Construction  of  Texas,                               Ltd.         and      Covenant              General                Contractors,
    Tnc.        agreed           to       by
    arbitrate           including
    all        claims                 the         parties,
    those arising out of any administrative and/ or statutory basis.
    The     issue           of      whether           a party              to    an      arbitration                      agreement                 has
    waived             arbitration                   is   for                 the        arbitrator                        to           decide.
    International                  River        Center           v.       Johns -Manville                Sales                Corp.,           2002-
    3060 (       La.       12/ 3/      03),     
    861 So. 2d 139
    ,      142;          Arkel        Constructors,                         Inc.
    v.     Duplantier &                   Meric,           Architects,              L. L. C.,           2006- 1950 (                    La.        App.
    1st         Cir.        7/ 25/ 07),              
    965 So. 2d 455
    ,            461.          Additionally,                          by
    incorporating                         the              American                 Arbitration                           Association' s
    Construction                    Industry               Arbitration                  Rules            into              the            subject
    arbitration                    agreements,                   the          parties                agreed                that "[                 t] he
    arbitrator               shall            have         the       power        to     rule           on         his         or       her         own
    jurisdiction,                     including                any        objections                 with          respect               to         the
    existence,               scope,            or    validity              of     the        arbitration                      agreement."
    See     Fla.        Gas        Transmission                  Company,           LLC         v.     Texas             Brine          Company,
    LLC,        2017- 0304 (            La.     App.           1st    Cir.       12/   6/ 18),          
    267 So. 3d 633
    ,           637,
    reh' g    denied (                  Jan.         25,         2019),          writ           denied,              2019- 0333 (                   La.
    6/ 26/ 19),    
    275 So. 3d 876
    ;        Jasper           Contractors,                        Inc.              V.      E-
    Claim. com,             LLC,          2011- 0978 (            La.      App.        1st       Cir.         5/    4/    12),          
    94 So. 3d 123
    ,        134.        Accordingly,                   the       defendants'                exception                of      prematurity
    and     motion           to       stay     is     granted             and    this       matter            is         stayed          pending
    arbitration               of      these         claims.
    JMM
    AHP
    Holdridge,              J.,         concurs           in    the        result,           although                   I    believe
    the      better            approach              would           be     to      remand             this              matter           to        the
    district           court           for      a    re --
    trial             of    the     exception                  of        prematurity,
    with the parties                        being      afforded the                 opportunity to                        introduce                 all
    relevant           evidence.                    Giacona          v.     Conti        Commodity                  Services,                     Inc.,
    
    413 So. 2d 487
     (      La.      1982).
    C       T    OF    A         AL,      FIRST       CIRCUIT
    T
    DEPUTY          CL     RK     OF    COURT
    FOR     THE       COURT
    

Document Info

Docket Number: 2020CW0939

Filed Date: 12/8/2020

Precedential Status: Precedential

Modified Date: 10/22/2024