State Of Louisiana v. Russell Bendily, Jr. ( 2020 )


Menu:
  •                                  STATE OF LOUISIANA
    COURT OF APPEAL, FIRST CIRCUIT
    STATE         OF     LOUISIANA                                                                  NO.     2020      KW    0678
    VERSUS
    RUSSELL            BENDILY,        JR.
    SEP 2 8 2020
    In      Re:           The       Victim       B.       B.,                                                                    20th
    applying for           supervisory writs,
    Judicial             District           Court,       Parish     of       East     Feliciana,            No.
    19 - CR - 291.
    BEFORE:              MCDONALD,             HOLDRIDGE,               AND    PENZATO,       JJ.
    WRIT        GRANTED.             REQUEST            FOR      ORAL    ARGUMENT              DENIED.            If    the
    defendant             is    charged               with       a    sex      offense,        a    subpoena           or    court
    order          compelling              production                 of      medical     records              shall       not     be
    issued             upon     request              of     the       defendant         unless           the    subpoena           or
    court order identifies the records sought with particularity and
    is reasonably limited as to subject matter, and the court finds,
    after a contradictory hearing with the state, that the requested
    records are  likely to be relevant and admissible at trial and
    are not sought for the purpose of harassing the victim.                                                                See    La.
    R. S.         15: 206( A).             A                                                                   held     in
    contradictory                  hearing    was        not                         this
    case,         and    based        on       the     record         before      this    court,          it    is   not     clear
    whether the defendant in this case has made a sufficient showing
    of      possible                                            and                                the                       items
    materiality                             relevance        of                numerous
    listed          in    the       subpoena              duces       tecum.       Accordingly,                this     case       is
    remanded for a contradictory hearing with all counsel of record.
    Thereafter,                if    the        court           finds      that    the    requested              records          are
    likely to be            relevant and admissible at trial and are not                                                    sought
    for      the       purpose  of harassing the victim, then the court                                                     should
    conduct an in camera review of only those records that meet such
    criteria             for    production.                       See      also   State        v.        Devol,      2017- 
    0646 La. 6
    / 5/ 17),        
    221 So. 3d 38
    .
    JMM
    GH
    AHP
    COURT         OF    APPEAL,       FIRS            CIRCUIT
    Diu -( P11
    DEPUTY          CLERKOF
    CAERK             COURT
    FOR    THE    COURT
    

Document Info

Docket Number: 2020KW0678

Filed Date: 9/28/2020

Precedential Status: Precedential

Modified Date: 10/22/2024