State Of Louisiana v. Joshua Jermaine Calloway ( 2020 )


Menu:
  •                                STATE OF LOUISIANA
    COURT OF APPEAL
    f
    yy                                  FIRST CIRCUIT
    NO. 2018 KA 1724
    STATE OF LOUISIANA
    VERSUS
    JOSHUA JERMAINE CALLOWAY
    Judgment Rendered.
    MAY 2 g 2028
    Appealed from the
    32nd Judicial District Court
    In and for the Parish of Terrebonne
    State of Louisiana
    Case No. 731417 E
    The Honorable Randall L. Bethancourt, Judge Presiding
    Bertha M. Hillman                          Counsel for Defendant/Appellant
    Covington, Louisiana                       Joshua Jermaine Calloway
    Joseph L. Waitz                            Counsel for Appellee
    District Attorney                          State of Louisiana
    Ellen Daigle Doskey
    Assistant District Attorney
    Houma, Louisiana
    BEFORE: GUIDRY, THERIOT, AND PENZATO, JJ.
    THERIOT, J.
    Defendant, Joshua Calloway, was charged by bill of indictment with second
    degree murder, a violation of La. R. S. 14: 30. 1.            He pled not guilty. After a trial by
    jury, defendant was found guilty as charged. The trial court imposed a term of life
    imprisonment at hard labor, to be served without the benefit of probation, parole,
    or suspension of sentence.           Defendant now appeals.'               In his sole assignment of
    error, defendant challenges his conviction by a non -unanimous jury verdict.
    In the recent decision of Ramos v. Louisiana, — U.S. _,                     
    140 S. Ct. 1390
    ,
    1397, _      L.Ed.2d — ( 2020), 
    2020 WL 1906545
    , at * 6, the United States Supreme
    Court overruled Apodaca v. Oregon, 
    406 U.S. 404
    , 
    92 S. Ct. 1628
    , 
    32 L.Ed.2d 184
    1972),     and held that the right to a jury trial under the Sixth Amendment of the
    United      States   Constitution,     incorporated        against   the    States   by way    of   the
    Fourteenth Amendment of the United States Constitution, requires a unanimous
    verdict to convict a defendant of a serious offense. The Ramos Court further noted
    that its ruling applied to those defendants convicted of felonies by non -unanimous
    verdicts whose cases are still pending on direct appeal. Ramos, 
    140 S. Ct. at 1406
    ,
    
    2020 WL 1906545
    , at * 13.
    Accordingly, defendant' s conviction and sentence are set aside, and the case
    is remanded for a new trial.
    CONVICTION AND SENTENCE SET ASIDE, REMANDED TO TRIAL
    COURT FOR NEW TRIAL.
    Due to the United States Supreme Court' s grant of certiorari in Ramos v. Louisiana, _
    U. S._,   
    139 S. Ct. 1318
    , 
    203 L.Ed. 2d 563
     ( 2019), and because the constitutionality of defendant' s
    conviction by a non -unanimous jury verdict is the sole assignment of error on appeal, this court
    stayed the instant matter until a ruling was issued in Ramos. See State v. Calloway, 2018- 
    1724 La. App. 1
     st Cir. 4/ 10/ 19) ( unpublished order).
    2
    

Document Info

Docket Number: 2018KA1724

Filed Date: 5/29/2020

Precedential Status: Precedential

Modified Date: 10/22/2024